liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Pharmacists views on integrated electronic prescribing systems: associations between usefulness, pharmacological safety, and barriers to technology use
Urmia University Med Science, Department Social Med, Orumiyeh, Iran Urmia University Med Science, Department Med Informat, Orumiyeh, Iran .
Linköping University, Department of Medicine and Health Sciences, Division of Preventive and Social Medicine and Public Health Science. Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences. Östergötlands Läns Landsting, Centre for Public Health Sciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6049-5402
2011 (English)In: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, ISSN 0031-6970, Vol. 67, no 2, 179-184 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Purpose Integrated electronic prescribing systems (IEPSs) are expected to improve efficiency and safety in the management of pharmaceuticals throughout the healthcare sector. In Sweden (population 9 million), more than 25 million e-prescriptions each year are processed in the National IEPS. We set out to examine the introduction of an IEPS into pharmacists practice with regard to impact on work efficiency and pharmacological safety. Methods A questionnaire was distributed to all pharmacists (n=74) in a Swedish municipality (population 145,000), where an IEPS had recently been introduced. The response rate was 70%. Results The IEPS was in general perceived to have expedited the processing of prescriptions and reduced the risk for prescription errors as well as the handing over of erroneous medications to patients. We found that there was a positive correlation between usefulness of the IEPS system for work efficacy and pharmacological safety, respectively (r=0.524, pandlt;.001) and a negative correlation between the usefulness of the IEPS for work efficacy and perception of barriers to technology use (r=-0.010, pandgt;0.05). We also found that there was a negative correlation between IEPS usefulness for pharmacological safety and that barriers to IEPS technology use were experienced (r=0.031, pandgt;0.05). Conclusions The results indicate that reduction of system unavailability due to technical issues will increase the perceived usefulness of IEPSs for pharmacists with regard to both work efficacy and pharmacological safety. We conclude that the introduction of an IEPS was well received by pharmacists; however, barriers to full acceptance remained, in particular, system unavailability due to technical problems.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer Science Business Media , 2011. Vol. 67, no 2, 179-184 p.
Keyword [en]
Electronic prescribing, Pharmacist, Pharmacological safety, Work performance
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-66308DOI: 10.1007/s00228-010-0936-9ISI: 000286783900010OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-66308DiVA: diva2:403229
Available from: 2011-03-11 Created: 2011-03-11 Last updated: 2013-09-05

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Timpka, Toomas

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Timpka, Toomas
By organisation
Division of Preventive and Social Medicine and Public Health ScienceFaculty of Health SciencesCentre for Public Health Sciences
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 136 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf