liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Collaborative innovation with suppliers – A conceptual model for characterizing supplier contributions to NPD
Linköping University, Department of Management and Engineering, Project management, Innovations and Entrepreneurship . Linköping University, The Institute of Technology.
Linköping University, Department of Management and Engineering, Project management, Innovations and Entrepreneurship . Linköping University, The Institute of Technology.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5427-3560
2012 (English)In: International Journal of Technology Intelligence and Planning (IJTIP), ISSN 1740-2832, Vol. 8, no 2, 197-214 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

It is widely acknowledged that suppliers contribute positively to innovation in New Product Development (NPD). However, it remains rather unclear what suppliers actually contribute to innovation. Based on a literature review focusing on 80 articles and a focus group meeting with strategic purchasing managers, a conceptual framework is developed categorising different supplier inputs to innovation. This model is formulated by characterising supplier inputs on a component level and an architectural level, related to knowledge extension and knowledge reconfiguration, respectively. Further, supplier inputs can be incremental or radical in nature, resulting in either a dependence on the supplier’s process knowledge or the supplier’s technology knowledge. These situations imply different conditions for knowledge integration.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
InderScience Publishers, 2012. Vol. 8, no 2, 197-214 p.
National Category
Social Sciences
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-68314DOI: 10.1504/IJTIP.2012.048477OAI: diva2:417834
Earlier version presented at the R&D Management Conference, 28-30 June
Knowledge Integration and Collaboration (KIC)
Available from: 2012-08-27 Created: 2011-05-18 Last updated: 2015-03-04Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Knowledge Integration and Innovation in Buyer-Supplier Collaborations
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Knowledge Integration and Innovation in Buyer-Supplier Collaborations
2013 (English)Licentiate thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Research indicates buyer-supplier collaborations in new product development (NPD) can have a positive impact on innovation. From a knowledge based view, it is argued that suppliers add a complementary knowledge base that is combined with the buyer’s knowledge. But what does the supplier contribution actually consist of? And more importantly: How is this supplier knowledge integrated into the NPD process? This is not clear in the literature. Different supplier inputs may imply different knowledge integration mechanisms and practices.

The purpose of this licentiate thesis is to investigate how supplier knowledge is integrated into the NPD process. The focus is to explore how knowledge intensive manufacturing firms integrate different supplier inputs in collaborative NPD projects by using different knowledge integration mechanisms.

To fulfil the aim of thesis a qualitative approach has been applied and by studying NPD processes in three industrial sectors. An extensive literature review and a focus group meeting are followed by two qualitative case studies that are based mainly on interviews with keyrepresentatives in the buyer-supplier collaborations. The first study investigates different supplier contributions by categorizing different supplier inputs. The second study – which is the largest part of the overall study - investigates how supplier knowledge is integrated in NPD collaborations using different integration mechanisms. Here, six NPD collaborations, representing the automotive, the energy, and the telecom sectors, are studied and compared, in order to understand the integration processes and the different knowledge integration mechanisms. The third study investigates the role of trust in capturing supplier knowledge. Here, two NPD collaborations which can be considered to be polar-cases in terms of scope and depth are compared in order to explore and explain the role of trust in the integration processes.

Altogether these studies lay a foundation for a model of knowledge integration between the buyer and the supplier in NPD collaborations. The model identifies two main strategies for integrating supplier knowledge – knowledge absorption and joint knowledge accumulation.

Knowledge absorption concerns innovation processes where the contribution from suppliers is focused on product- and process improvements, i.e. incremental input. Here, the development is dictated by clear specifications. Supplier contacts take place during a limited period of time and are restricted to certain phases in NPD projects. Thus, the main knowledge integration mechanism used is sequencing. In these situations, the buyer actually tries to capture and absorb the knowledge of the supplier at a specific point in the process. A basic level of trust, based on the reputation the supplier has for competence is sufficient.

Joint knowledge accumulation, on the other hand, is how firms manage more radical input from suppliers, such as new technology or new design. In these cases, knowledge integration strategies extend over a longer period of time, throughout several phases of the NPD project. There is a high degree of interaction between the people involved, to find new solutions. The main knowledge integration mechanism is group problem-solving. Knowledge is jointly accumulated by sharing, combining, and creating new knowledge in open processes. In these cases, a profound level of trust is required.

When integrating supplier knowledge in innovation, management has to consider the possible and preferred outcome of the collaboration; it might be a commercial deal to provide for a temporary access to knowledge, or it might be a long-term alliance, where joint learning is an aim. In the first case, a traditional NPD process with clear specifications, using sequencing and technological interfaces, will be adequate. In the second case, focus should be on interpersonal problem solving between trustworthy individuals.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Linköping: Linköping University Electronic Press, 2013. 87 p.
Linköping Studies in Science and Technology. Thesis, ISSN 0280-7971 ; 1575
Knowledge integration, innovation, buyer-supplier collaborations, NPD
National Category
Engineering and Technology
urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-88028 (URN)LiU-TEK-LIC 2013:9 (Local ID)978-91-7519-696-1 (ISBN)LiU-TEK-LIC 2013:9 (Archive number)LiU-TEK-LIC 2013:9 (OAI)
2013-02-15, ACAS, A-huset, Campus Valla, Linköpings universitet, Linköping, 13:15 (Swedish)
Available from: 2013-01-29 Created: 2013-01-29 Last updated: 2015-03-04Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(480 kB)2307 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 480 kBChecksum SHA-512
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Rosell, David TLakemond, Nicolette
By organisation
Project management, Innovations and Entrepreneurship The Institute of Technology
In the same journal
International Journal of Technology Intelligence and Planning (IJTIP)
Social Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 2307 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 246 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link