liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
NorVold Abuse Questionnaire for Men (m-NorAQ): Validation of New Measures of Emotional, Physical, and Sexual Abuse and Abuse in Health Care in Male Patients
Linköping University, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Gender and medicine. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
2011 (English)In: GENDER MEDICINE, ISSN 1550-8579, Vol. 8, no 2, 69-79 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: There are far more prevalence studies on abuse of females than on males as subjects of abuse. The NorVold Abuse Questionnaire (NorAQ) measures emotional, physical, and sexual abuse, as well as abuse in health care, in women and men. Objective: The aim of this study was to test the concurrent validity and test-retest reliability of the questions in the version of NorAQ administered to men (m-NorAQ) against the interview model. Methods: The validation was tested in a subsample (n = 86) of a male patient sample who had filled out the m-NorAQ (N = 1667). Respondents completed m-NorAQ twice and were then interviewed. Before the interview, respondents were instructed to answer questions based on personal experience. The interview consisted of 4 open-ended questions about lifetime experiences of emotional, physical, and sexual abuse and abuse in health care. Results: Results indicated that respondents in the subsample had discussed the experiences of abuse more often in both formal and informal settings than had subjects in the total patient sample. Measures of sensitivity for m-NorAQ were good to excellent (emotional abuse, 83%; physical abuse, 76%; sexual abuse, 68%; abuse in health care, 93%), as were those for specificity (emotional abuse, 72%; physical abuse, 92%; sexual abuse, 99%, abuse in health care, 90%); likelihood ratios were satisfactory (emotional abuse, 3; physical abuse, 9; sexual abuse, 46; abuse in health care, 9); and test-retest reliability measures were excellent (emotional abuse, 80%-95%; physical abuse, 77%-88%; sexual abuse, 91%-100%; abuse in health care, 84%-92%). Conclusion: m-NorAQ showed good to excellent concurrent validity for the different types of abuse and excellent reliability for all questions about abuse. In spite of methodological challenges, validation studies must be conducted as a minimum precaution to ensure that an instrument accurately measures abuse as intended.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier Science B.V. Amsterdam , 2011. Vol. 8, no 2, 69-79 p.
Keyword [en]
abuse in health care, emotional abuse, NorAQ NorVold Abuse Questionnaire, physical abuse, reliability, sexual abuse, validity
National Category
Engineering and Technology
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-68915DOI: 10.1016/j.genm.2011.03.001ISI: 000290924100002OAI: diva2:421952
Available from: 2011-06-10 Created: 2011-06-10 Last updated: 2011-06-10

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Swahnberg, Katarina
By organisation
Gender and medicineFaculty of Arts and Sciences
Engineering and Technology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 40 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link