liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Reduction in mortality after epidural anaesthesia and analgesia in patients undergoing rectal but not colonic cancer surgery: a retrospective analysis of data from 655 patients in Central Sweden
Linköping University, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Anesthesiology. Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences. Östergötlands Läns Landsting, Sinnescentrum, Department of Anaesthesiology and Surgery UHL.
Department Anaesthesiol and Intens Care, Orebro.
Linköping University, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Surgery. Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences. Östergötlands Läns Landsting, Centre for Surgery, Orthopaedics and Cancer Treatment, Department of Surgery in Östergötland.
Show others and affiliations
2011 (English)In: British Journal of Anaesthesia, ISSN 0007-0912, E-ISSN 1471-6771, Vol. 107, no 2, 164-170 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background. There is some evidence that epidural analgesia (EDA) reduces tumour recurrence after breast and prostatic cancer surgery. We assessed whether EDA reduces long-term mortality after colorectal cancer surgery. Methods. All patients having colorectal cancer surgery between January 2004 and January 2008 at Linkoping and Orebro were included. Exclusion criteria were: emergency operations, laparoscopic-assisted colorectal resection, and stage 4 cancer. Statistical information was obtained from the Swedish National Register for Deaths. Patients were analysed in two groups: EDA group or patient-controlled analgesia (PCA group) as the primary method of analgesia. Results. A total of 655 patients could be included. All-cause mortality for colorectal cancer (stages 1-3) was 22.7% (colon: 20%, rectal: 26%) after 1-5 yr of surgery. Multivariate regression analysis identified the following statistically significant factors for death after colon cancer (Pless than0.05): age (greater than72 yr) and cancer stage 3 (compared with stage 1). A similar model for rectal cancer found that age (greater than72 yr) and the use of PCA rather than EDA and cancer stages 2 and 3 (compared with stage 1) were associated with a higher risk for death. No significant risk of death was found for colon cancer when comparing EDA with PCA (P=0.23), but a significantly increased risk of death was seen after rectal cancer when PCA was used compared with EDA (P=0.049) [hazards ratio: 0.52 (0.27-1.00)]. Conclusions. We found a reduction in all-cause mortality after rectal but not colon cancer in patients having EDA compared with PCA technique.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Oxford University Press , 2011. Vol. 107, no 2, 164-170 p.
Keyword [en]
analgesia, epidural, patient controlled; complications, death; surgery, colorectal
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-69786DOI: 10.1093/bja/aer100ISI: 000292779000008OAI: diva2:433590
Available from: 2011-08-10 Created: 2011-08-08 Last updated: 2012-03-19

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Gupta, AnilHallböök, OlofEintrei, Christina
By organisation
AnesthesiologyFaculty of Health SciencesDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Surgery UHLSurgeryDepartment of Surgery in ÖstergötlandDepartment of Intensive Care UHL
In the same journal
British Journal of Anaesthesia
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 131 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link