liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Contrasting as a research strategy for highlighting polyphonic sensemaking in stories of organizational life
Linköping University, Department of Management and Engineering, Business Administration. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3030-0314
2011 (English)Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Field work is a phenomenal but unpredictable source of material for those of us interested in stories of organizing and sensemaking about organizational life. When entering the field we meet people engaged in work and in organizations, who are often keen to tell us what’s going on. These meetings can be both stunning and overwhelming. Where do I start to listen, and where should I stop? The stories of the organization never stop, as new and reoccurring activities needs to be made sense of in the discussions with other organizational actors (Boje, 1991). By relating ongoing events to stories, life in the organization is made meaningful (Czarniawska, 1999). Not all stories of day-to-day life are told with a clear beginning, plot and end, though. The fieldworker interested in narrating the organization becomes a collector of fragmented story parts, and needs to reassemble these parts into a comprehensive whole that can make sense to a reader. The stories possible to tell often become numerous, especially with a longitudinal field study approach. Then how do we choose which stories to tell and how to tell them? One approach is to reassemble several stories told by different actors but relating to the same issue and contrast them against each other. In this paper, experiences of using contrasting as a research strategy for story construction and analysis within one single case study are highlighted and discussed from a sensemaking approach to organizing. The paper illustrates how contrasting can be a used both as a means of embracing polyphony and for avoiding the pitfall of drawing too much attention to consensus building and shedding too little light on conflict, a critique voiced against sensemaking research (Skålén, 2002). Up until now, only a modest amount of empirical research has been done on sensemaking and this is an important research agenda (Weick et al., 2005). This paper contributes to problematizing how empirical research can contribute to the understanding of sensemaking in organizations.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2011.
National Category
Social Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-69961OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-69961DiVA: diva2:433654
Conference
27th EGOS Colloquium
Available from: 2011-08-11 Created: 2011-08-10 Last updated: 2015-01-14Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Authority records BETA

Andersson Högberg, Lena

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Andersson Högberg, Lena
By organisation
Business AdministrationFaculty of Arts and Sciences
Social Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 70 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf