liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Global quality imaging: Emerging issues
International Radiology Quality Network, Balwyn, Australia.
World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria.
Show others and affiliations
2011 (English)In: Journal of the American College of Radiology, ISSN 1546-1440, Vol. 8, no 7, 508-512 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Quality imaging may be described as “a timely access to and delivery of integrated and appropriate procedures, in a safe and responsive practice, and a prompt delivery of an accurately interpreted report by capable personnel in an efficient, effective, and sustainable manner.” For this article, radiation safety is considered as one of the key quality elements. The stakeholders are the drivers of quality imaging. These include those that directly provide or use imaging procedures and others indirectly supporting the system. Imaging is indispensable in health care, and its use has greatly expanded worldwide. Globalization, consumer sophistication, communication and technological advances, corporatization, rationalization, service outsourcing, teleradiology, workflow modularization, and commoditization are reshaping practice. This article defines the emerging issues; an earlier article in the May 2011 issue described possible improvement actions. The issues that could threaten the quality use of imaging for all countries include workforce shortage; increased utilization, population radiation exposure, and cost; practice changes; and efficiency drive and budget constraints. In response to these issues, a range of quality improvement measures, strategies, and actions are used to maximize the benefits and minimize the risks. The 3 measures are procedure justification, optimization of image quality and radiation protection, and error prevention. The development and successful implementation of such improvement actions require leadership, collaboration, and the active participation of all stakeholders to achieve the best outcomes that we all advocate.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
United States: Elsevier Inc. , 2011. Vol. 8, no 7, 508-512 p.
Keyword [en]
Quality and safety; quality improvement; radiation protection; radiation safety; procedure justification; optimization of protection; radiology errors; adverse events; referral guidelines
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-70299DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2010.12.028ISI: 000306201500013PubMedID: 21723489OAI: diva2:438198
Available from: 2011-09-01 Created: 2011-09-01 Last updated: 2015-10-09

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ringertz, Hans
By organisation
Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization (CMIV)RadiologyFaculty of Health Sciences
In the same journal
Journal of the American College of Radiology
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 22 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link