liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Global quality imaging: Improvement actions
International Radiology Quality Network, Balwyn, Australia.
World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, United States.
International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria.
Show others and affiliations
2011 (English)In: Journal of the American College of Radiology, ISSN 1546-1440, E-ISSN 1558-349X, Vol. 8, no 5, 330-334 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Workforce shortage, workload increase, workplace changes, and budget challenges are emerging issues around the world, which could place quality imaging at risk. It is important for imaging stakeholders to collaborate, ensure patient safety, improve the quality of care, and address these issues. There is no single panacea. A range of improvement measures, strategies, and actions are required. Examples of improvement actions supporting the 3 quality measures are described under 5 strategies: conducting research, promoting awareness, providing education and training, strengthening infrastructure, and implementing policies. The challenge is to develop long-term, cost-effective, system-based improvement actions that will bring better outcomes and underpin a sustainable future for quality imaging. In an imaging practice, these actions will result in selecting the right procedure (justification), using the right dose (optimization), and preventing errors along the patient journey. To realize this vision and implement these improvement actions, a range of expertise and adequate resources are required. Stakeholders should collaborate and work together. In today's globalized environment, collaboration is strength and provides synergy to achieve better outcomes and greater success.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
United States: Elsevier Inc. , 2011. Vol. 8, no 5, 330-334 p.
Keyword [en]
Quality and safety; quality improvement; radiation protection; radiation safety; procedure justification; optimization of protection; radiology errors; adverse events; referral guidelines
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-70302DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2011.01.005ISI: 000306201300010PubMedID: 21531309OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-70302DiVA: diva2:438203
Available from: 2011-09-01 Created: 2011-09-01 Last updated: 2017-12-08

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21531309

Authority records BETA

Ringertz, Hans

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ringertz, Hans
By organisation
Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization (CMIV)RadiologyFaculty of Health Sciences
In the same journal
Journal of the American College of Radiology
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 50 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf