liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Surfing for mouth guards: assessing quality of online information
Distriktstandvarden Tulegatan.
Linköping University, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Division of Preventive and Social Medicine and Public Health Science. Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences.
2011 (English)In: Dental Traumatology, ISSN 1600-4469, E-ISSN 1600-9657, Vol. 27, no 5, 334-343 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Introduction: The Internet is an easily accessible and commonly used source of health-related information, but evaluations of the quality of this information within the dental trauma field are still lacking. Aim: The aims of this study are (i) to present the most current scientific knowledge regarding mouth guards used in sport activities, (ii) to suggest a scoring system to evaluate the quality of information pertaining to mouth guard protection related to World Wide Web sites and (iii) to employ this scoring system when seeking reliable mouth guard-related websites. Materials and methods: First, an Internet search using the keywords athletic injuries/prevention and control and mouth protector or mouth guards in English was performed on PubMed, Cochrane, SvedMed+ and Web of Science to identify scientific knowledge about mouth guards. Second, an Internet search using the keywords consumer health information Internet, Internet information public health and web usage-seeking behaviour was performed on PubMed and Web of Science to obtain scientific articles seeking to evaluate the quality of health information on the Web. Based on the articles found in the second search, two scoring systems were selected. Then, an Internet search using the keywords mouth protector, mouth guards and gum shields in English was performed on the search engines Google, MSN and Yahoo. The websites selected were evaluated for reliability and accuracy. Results: Of the 223 websites retrieved, 39 were designated valid and evaluated. Nine sites scored 22 or higher. The mean total score of the 39 websites was 14.2. Fourteen websites scored higher than the mean total score, and 25 websites scored less. The highest total score, presented by a Public Institution Web site (Health Canada), was 31 from a maximum possible score of 34, and the lowest score was 0. Conclusion: This study shows that there is a high amount of information about mouth guards on the Internet but that the quality of this information varies. It should be the responsibility of health care professionals to suggest and provide reliable Internet URL addresses to patients. In addition, an appropriate search terminology and search strategy should be made available to persons who want to search beyond the recommended sites.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
John Wiley and Sons , 2011. Vol. 27, no 5, 334-343 p.
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-71073DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.2011.01017.xISI: 000294912700003OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-71073DiVA: diva2:444867
Available from: 2011-09-30 Created: 2011-09-30 Last updated: 2017-12-08

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Glendor, Ulf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Glendor, Ulf
By organisation
Division of Preventive and Social Medicine and Public Health ScienceFaculty of Health Sciences
In the same journal
Dental Traumatology
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 36 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf