liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Psychosocial interventions as part of breast cancer rehabilitation programs? Results from a systematic review
St Olavs University Hospital.
Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
Oslo University Hospital.
Norwegian Knowledge Centre for Health Service.
Show others and affiliations
2011 (English)In: Psycho-Oncology, ISSN 1057-9249, E-ISSN 1099-1611, Vol. 20, no 9, 909-918 p.Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objective: This systematic review aimed to determine the effectiveness of psychoeducation, cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) and social support interventions used in the rehabilitation of breast cancer (BC) patients. less thanbrgreater than less thanbrgreater thanMethods: We conducted a systematic literature search to identify randomised controlled trials of female BC patients who underwent different psychosocial interventions during or after primary cancer treatment. The methodological quality of all studies was independently assessed by two reviewers. Studies with low quality, less than 20 participants in each group, patients with metastatic cancer, data not presented separately for BC and studies that included other cancer types were excluded. less thanbrgreater than less thanbrgreater thanResults: Among 9617 identified studies, only 18 RCTs published between 1999 and 2008, including 3272 patients were finally included in this systematic evaluation. Outcome measures were categorised into quality of life (QoL), fatigue, mood, health behaviour and social function. Six trials examined psychoeducation had inconsistent results, both during and after the primary treatment. Seven trials examined the effect of CBT, four of which given after primary treatment (range 6-12 weeks) demonstrated improvements in QoL; the other three CBT studies given during primary treatment (range 9-20 weeks) had inconsistencies. Five studies addressed social support and showed no conclusive impacts of this intervention. less thanbrgreater than less thanbrgreater thanConclusions: Limited documentation exists on the efficacy of psychosocial rehabilitation interventions among BC patients. However, we found that patients might have QoL benefits from CBT given after primary BC treatment. More documentation is needed regarding the effects of CBT during primary treatment and the effects of psychoeducation and social support.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Wiley-Blackwell , 2011. Vol. 20, no 9, 909-918 p.
Keyword [en]
breast cancer, oncology, rehabilitation, psychosocial, systematic review
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-71388DOI: 10.1002/pon.1844ISI: 000295122700001OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-71388DiVA: diva2:448045
Available from: 2011-10-14 Created: 2011-10-14 Last updated: 2017-12-08

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Falkmer, Ursula

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Falkmer, Ursula
By organisation
Department of Clinical and Experimental MedicineFaculty of Health Sciences
In the same journal
Psycho-Oncology
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 47 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf