LiU Electronic Press
Download:
File size:
1067 kb
Format:
application/pdf
Author:
Burgard, W. (University of Freiburg)
Stachniss, C. (University of Freiburg)
Grisetti, G. (University of Freiburg)
Steder, B. (University of Freiburg)
Kümmerle, R. (University of Freiburg)
Dornhege, C. (University of Freiburg)
Ruhnke, M. (University of Freiburg)
Kleiner, Alexander (University of Freiburg)
Tardós, Juan D. (University of Freiburg)
Title:
A Comparison of SLAM Algorithms Based on a Graph of Relations
Publication type:
Conference paper (Refereed)
Language:
English
In:
IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS)
Conference:
The 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on intelligent Robots and Systems, October 11-15, 2009 St. Louis, USA
Publisher: IEEE conference proceedings
Pages:
2089-2095
Year of publ.:
2009
URI:
urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-72535
Permanent link:
http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-72535
Subject category:
Robotics
Project:
Artificial Intelligence & Integrated Computer Systems
Abstract(en) :

In this paper, we address the problem of creating an objective benchmark for comparing SLAM approaches. We propose a framework for analyzing the results of SLAM approaches based on a metric for measuring the error of the corrected trajectory. The metric uses only relative relations between poses and does not rely on a global reference frame. The idea is related to graph-based SLAM approaches, namely to consider the energy that is needed to deform the trajectory estimated by a SLAM approach into the ground truth trajectory. Our method enables us to compare SLAM approaches that use different estimation techniques or different sensor modalities since all computations are made based on the corrected trajectory of the robot. We provide sets of relative relations needed to compute our metric for an extensive set of datasets frequently used in the SLAM community. The relations have been obtained by manually matching laser-range observations to avoid the errors caused by matching algorithms. Our benchmark framework allows the user an easy analysis and objective comparisons between different SLAM approaches.

Available from:
2011-11-29
Created:
2011-11-28
Last updated:
2011-12-07
Statistics:
22 hits
FILE INFORMATION
File size:
1067 kb
Mimetype:
application/pdf
Type:
fulltext
Statistics:
370 hits
Version:
Authorʼs version