liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Two ways of grounding the discussion on extended cognition
Linköping University, Department of Computer and Information Science, NLPLAB - Natural Language Processing Laboratory. Linköping University, Department of Computer and Information Science, Human-Centered systems. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
Linköping University, Department of Culture and Communication, Arts and Humanities. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
Linköping University, Department of Computer and Information Science, Human-Centered systems. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
Linköping University, Department of Computer and Information Science, Human-Centered systems. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
2011 (English)In: Expanding the Space of Cognitive Science: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Meeting of theCognitive Science Society / [ed] Laura Carlson, Christoph Hoelscher, Thomas F. Shipley, Cognitive Science Society, Inc., 2011, 2347-2352 p.Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

We question two of the basic foundations of the Extended Mind hypothesis originally formulated by Clark and Chalmers, i.e. that all cognition is organism centered and that the important theoretical issues that the debate surrounding the Extended Mind hypothesis can fruitfully be resolved by to a large extent rely on invented examples of cognitive activities as the empirical foundation. We suggest that one way to proceed is to frame the hypothesis within the larger theoretical framework of activity theory, and another is to conduct extensive field studies of extended cognitive processes. We illustrate our position with examples of how these can be used to reformulate some of the aspects of the Extended Mind hypothesis.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Cognitive Science Society, Inc., 2011. 2347-2352 p.
Keyword [en]
Extended mind; Activity Theory; Cognitive Ethnography
National Category
Philosophy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-72770ISBN: 978-0-9768318-7-7 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-72770DiVA: diva2:462331
Conference
33rd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Boston, Massachusetts, July 20-23, 2011
Available from: 2011-12-06 Created: 2011-12-06 Last updated: 2016-09-20Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Link to publication

Authority records BETA

Dahlbäck, NilsStjernberg, FredrikKristiansson (Forsblad), MattiasSkagerlund, Kenny

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Dahlbäck, NilsStjernberg, FredrikKristiansson (Forsblad), MattiasSkagerlund, Kenny
By organisation
NLPLAB - Natural Language Processing LaboratoryHuman-Centered systemsFaculty of Arts and SciencesArts and Humanities
Philosophy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 147 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf