liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A trial-based economic evaluation of 2 nurse-led disease management programs in heart failure
University of Groningen.
University of Groningen.
Linköping University, Department of Social and Welfare Studies, Health, Activity, Care. Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences.
University of Groningen.
Show others and affiliations
2011 (English)In: American Heart Journal, ISSN 0002-8703, E-ISSN 1097-6744, Vol. 162, no 6, 1096-1104 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background Although previously conducted meta-analyses suggest that nurse-led disease management programs in heart failure (HF) can improve patient outcomes, uncertainty regarding the cost-effectiveness of such programs remains. Methods To compare the relative merits of 2 variants of a nurse-led disease management program (basic or intensive support by a nurse specialized in the management of patients with HF) against care as usual (routine follow-up by a cardiologist), a trial-based economic evaluation was conducted alongside the COACH study. Results In terms of costs per life-year, basic support was found to dominate care as usual, whereas the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio between intensive support and basic support was found to be equal to (sic)532,762 per life-year; in terms of costs per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY), basic support was found to dominate both care as usual and intensive support. An assessment of the uncertainty surrounding these findings showed that, at a threshold value of (sic)20,000 per life-year/(sic)20,000 per QALY, basic support was found to have a probability of 69/62% of being optimal against 17/30% and 14/8% for care as usual and intensive support, respectively. The results of our subgroup analysis suggest that a stratified approach based on offering basic support to patients with mild to moderate HF and intensive support to patients with severe HF would be optimal if the willingness-to-pay threshold exceeds (sic)45,345 per life-year/(sic)59,289 per QALY. Conclusions Although the differences in costs and effects among the 3 study groups were not statistically significant, from a decision-making perspective, basic support still had a relatively large probability of generating the highest health outcomes at the lowest costs. Our results also substantiated that a stratified approach based on offering basic support to patients with mild to moderate HF and intensive support to patients with severe HF could further improve health outcomes at slightly higher costs.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier , 2011. Vol. 162, no 6, 1096-1104 p.
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-73734DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2011.09.019ISI: 000298033300018OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-73734DiVA: diva2:476403
Available from: 2012-01-12 Created: 2012-01-12 Last updated: 2017-12-08

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(402 kB)285 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 402 kBChecksum SHA-512
f4f8497c96f0b743c99ab5c51ed82bfbb45377f9eaa87f3cb3ae6da2c6e2f456795f0d5841b327885f7c06b30e89b3e40e363f4e39140053c2eba5720c09a357
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Jaarsma, Tiny

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Jaarsma, Tiny
By organisation
Health, Activity, CareFaculty of Health Sciences
In the same journal
American Heart Journal
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 285 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 263 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf