liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Partisan Scholarship in Technoscientific Controversies: Reflections on Research Experience
Linköping University, The Tema Institute, Technology and Social Change. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
Linköping University, The Tema Institute, Technology and Social Change. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
2012 (English)In: Science as Culture, ISSN 0950-5431, E-ISSN 1470-1189, Vol. 21, no 3, 335-364 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Several academic traditions have addressed epistemological objectivity and/or partisanship in the study of technoscientific controversies. On the one hand, positivist andrelativist scholars agree that the political commitments of the social researcher should notimpinge on scientific enquiry, while on the other hand, feminist and Marxist scholars notonly take stands in diverse technoscientific debates, but even claim their agendas to bemore credible than those of orthodox scientists. Such perspectives stress that all researchis partisan in one way or another because it involves questions of who controls,manipulates, and establishes decisions, facts, and knowledge. With this in mind, it ispossible to identify different forms of partisan research including capture byparticipants, de facto and overt partisanship, and mercenary scholarship. These differentforms of partisan scholarship are characterised by differences in the motives underlyingepistemological choices of research topic and method, personal commitments to thefields studied, use of research findings in controversies, and positioning of results inwider debates. Two examples help to illustrate partisan scholarship: first, a study of newtechnologies for managing climate change (carbon dioxide capture and storage); andsecond, the construction of the new underground metro system in Athens and itsaccommodation of accessibility standards. Both cases entail partisan positions and raisesimilar concerns about the orthodox epistemological assumptions underpinningsociotechnical systems, especially when it comes to technoscientific controversies.Supporting STS partisan scholarship, therefore, enables greater social and democraticengagement with technoscientific development.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
London: Routledge, 2012. Vol. 21, no 3, 335-364 p.
Keyword [en]
Partisan STS scholarship, situated epistemology, technoscientific controversy, Carbon Capture Storage (CCS), disability, accessibility, Athens metro
National Category
Social Sciences
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-75219DOI: 10.1080/09505431.2011.644783ISI: 000308075400003OAI: diva2:504838
Available from: 2012-02-21 Created: 2012-02-21 Last updated: 2012-10-18

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(379 kB)280 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 379 kBChecksum SHA-512
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Galis, VasilisHansson, Anders
By organisation
Technology and Social ChangeFaculty of Arts and Sciences
In the same journal
Science as Culture
Social Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 280 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 134 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link