liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Maintaining Live Discussion in Two-Stage Open Peer Review
Linköping University, Department of Computer and Information Science, CASL - Cognitive Autonomous Systems Laboratory. Linköping University, The Institute of Technology. (AIICS)
2012 (English)In: Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, E-ISSN 1662-5188, Vol. 6, no 9Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Open peer review has been proposed for a number of reasons, in particular, for increasing the transparency of the article selection process for a journal, and for obtaining a broader basis for feedback to the authors and for the acceptance decision. The review discussion may also in itself have a value for the research community. These goals rely on the existence of a lively review discussion, but several experiments with open-process peer review in recent years have encountered the problem of faltering review discussions. The present article addresses the question of how lively review discussion may be fostered by relating the experience of the journal Electronic Transactions on Artificial Intelligence (ETAI) which was an early experiment with open peer review. Factors influencing the discussion activity are identified. It is observed that it is more difficult to obtain lively discussion when the number of contributed articles increases, which implies difficulties for scaling up the open peer review model. Suggestions are made for how this difficulty may be overcome.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Frontiers Research Foundation , 2012. Vol. 6, no 9
Keywords [en]
open peer review, community peer review, two-stage peer review, live discussion
National Category
Other Electrical Engineering, Electronic Engineering, Information Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-75915DOI: 10.3389/fncom.2012.00009ISI: 000301131200001OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-75915DiVA, id: diva2:510488
Note

funding agencies|Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation||

Available from: 2012-03-16 Created: 2012-03-16 Last updated: 2024-01-17

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(324 kB)365 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 324 kBChecksum SHA-512
a873fed8b73e5127225a01f1b23e46dec3ae692a36f62e0b2ae1e0ddecda5158fa61054241259977bbb8a86b83508e5a239862de24e02eeaf43f44c132176e3e
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Sandewall, Erik

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Sandewall, Erik
By organisation
CASL - Cognitive Autonomous Systems LaboratoryThe Institute of Technology
In the same journal
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
Other Electrical Engineering, Electronic Engineering, Information Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 372 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 329 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf