liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Routine internal- and external-quality control data in clinical laboratories for estimating measurement and diagnostic uncertainty using GUM principles
SP Technical Research Institute Sweden.
Phys Technical Bundesanstalt.
Linköping University, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Clinical Chemistry. Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences. Östergötlands Läns Landsting, Centre for Diagnostics, Department of Clinical Chemistry.
2012 (English)In: Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation, ISSN 0036-5513, Vol. 72, no 3, 212-220 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Healthcare laboratories are increasingly joining into larger laboratory organizations encompassing several physical laboratories. This caters for important new opportunities for re-defining the concept of a laboratory to encompass all laboratories and measurement methods measuring the same measurand for a population of patients. In order to make measurement results, comparable bias should be minimized or eliminated and measurement uncertainty properly evaluated for all methods used for a particular patient population. The measurement as well as diagnostic uncertainty can be evaluated from internal and external quality control results using GUM principles. In this paper the uncertainty evaluations are described in detail using only two main components, within-laboratory reproducibility and uncertainty of the bias component according to a Nordtest guideline. The evaluation is exemplified for the determination of creatinine in serum for a conglomerate of laboratories both expressed in absolute units (mu mol/L) and relative (%). An expanded measurement uncertainty of 12 mu mol/L associated with concentrations of creatinine below 120 mu mol/L and of 10% associated with concentrations above 120 mu mol/L was estimated. The diagnostic uncertainty encompasses both measurement uncertainty and biological variation, and can be estimated for a single value and for a difference. This diagnostic uncertainty for the difference for two samples from the same patient was determined to be 14 mu mol/L associated with concentrations of creatinine below 100 mu mol/L and 14 % associated with concentrations above 100 mu mol/L.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Informa Healthcare , 2012. Vol. 72, no 3, 212-220 p.
Keyword [en]
Metrology, GUM, measurement uncertainty, quality control, creatinine, analysis, bias, precision
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-77092DOI: 10.3109/00365513.2011.649015ISI: 000302562700005OAI: diva2:524965
Funding Agencies|European Community|217257|Available from: 2012-05-04 Created: 2012-05-04 Last updated: 2012-05-04

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Theodorsson, Elvar
By organisation
Clinical ChemistryFaculty of Health SciencesDepartment of Clinical Chemistry
In the same journal
Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 51 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link