Word Recognition for Temporally and Spectrally Distorted Materials: The Effects of Age and Hearing Loss
2012 (English)In: Ear and Hearing, ISSN 0196-0202, E-ISSN 1538-4667, Vol. 33, no 3, 349-366 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Objectives: The purpose of Experiment 1 was to measure word recognition in younger adults with normal hearing when speech or babble was temporally or spectrally distorted. In Experiment 2, older listeners with near-normal hearing and with hearing loss (for pure tones) were tested to evaluate their susceptibility to changes in speech level and distortion types. The results across groups and listening conditions were compared to assess the extent to which the effects of the distortions on word recognition resembled the effects of age-related differences in auditory processing or pure-tone hearing loss. less thanbrgreater than less thanbrgreater thanDesign: In Experiment 1, word recognition was measured in 16 younger adults with normal hearing using Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6 words in quiet and the Words-in-Noise test distorted by temporal jittering, spectral smearing, or combined jittering and smearing. Another 16 younger adults were evaluated in four conditions using the Words-in-Noise test in combinations of unaltered or jittered speech and unaltered or jittered babble. In Experiment 2, word recognition in quiet and in babble was measured in 72 older adults with near-normal hearing and 72 older adults with hearing loss in four conditions: unaltered, jittered, smeared, and combined jittering and smearing. less thanbrgreater than less thanbrgreater thanResults: For the listeners in Experiment 1, word recognition was poorer in the distorted conditions compared with the unaltered condition. The signal to noise ratio at 50% correct word recognition was 4.6 dB for the unaltered condition, 6.3 dB for the jittered, 6.8 dB for the smeared, 6.9 dB for the double-jitter, and 8.2 dB for the combined jitter-smear conditions. Jittering both the babble and speech signals did not significantly reduce performance compared with jittering only the speech. In Experiment 2, the older listeners with near-normal hearing and hearing loss performed best in the unaltered condition, followed by the jitter and smear conditions, with the poorest performance in the combined jitter-smear condition in both quiet and noise. Overall, listeners with near-normal hearing performed better than listeners with hearing loss by similar to 30% in quiet and similar to 6 dB in noise. In the quiet distorted conditions, when the level of the speech was increased, performance improved for the hearing loss group, but decreased for the older group with near-normal hearing. Recognition performance of younger listeners in the jitter-smear condition and the performance of older listeners with near-normal hearing in the unaltered conditions were similar. Likewise, the performance of older listeners with near-normal hearing in the jitter-smear condition and the performance of older listeners with hearing loss in the unaltered conditions were similar. less thanbrgreater than less thanbrgreater thanConclusions: The present experiments advance our understanding regarding how spectral or temporal distortions of the fine structure of speech affect word recognition in older listeners with and without clinically significant hearing loss. The Speech Intelligibility Index was able to predict group differences, but not the effects of distortion. Individual differences in performance were similar across all distortion conditions with both age and hearing loss being implicated. The speech materials needed to be both spectrally and temporally distorted to mimic the effects of age-related differences in auditory processing and hearing loss.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins , 2012. Vol. 33, no 3, 349-366 p.
National CategorySocial Sciences
IdentifiersURN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-77729DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318242571cISI: 000303454400005OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-77729DiVA: diva2:529450
Funding Agencies|Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)||Veterans Health Administration||Office of Research and Development, Rehabilitation Research and Development (RRD) Service||Career Development Award|C6394W|Senior Research Career Scientist Award|C4256L|Auditory and Vestibular Dysfunction Research Enhancement Award Program|C4339F|VA RR&D, Washington, D.C.||Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada|RGPIN 138472-05|Department of Veterans Affairs||Office of Research and Development, and Rehabilitation Research and Development||2012-05-302012-05-282012-06-05