liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Outcome of arthroscopic meniscectomy: A 13-year physical and radiographic follow-up of 43 patients under 23 years of age
Linköping University, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Sports Medicine . Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences. Östergötlands Läns Landsting, Centre for Surgery, Orthopaedics and Cancer Treatment, Department of Orthopaedics in Linköping.
Linköping University, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Sports Medicine . Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences. Östergötlands Läns Landsting, Centre for Surgery, Orthopaedics and Cancer Treatment, Department of Orthopaedics in Linköping.
1995 (English)In: Acta Orthopaedica, ISSN 1745-3674, E-ISSN 1745-3682, Vol. 66, no 2, 113-117 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

We reexamined 43 patients with stable knees at a mean of 13 years after arthroscopic meniscectomy. The patients had a maximum age of 22 years at the operation and no patient had had previous surgery on the involved knee. At the follow-up examination, no differences in range of motion, muscle strength or tibial A/P displacement were seen between the operated and the nonoperated knees and 36 patients had no problem with their knee in daily life. Radiographic changes were found in the operated knee in 20 patients and in the nonoperated knee in 5 patients. 8 patients had a reduction of the joint space on the involved side, but none had more severe changes. Cartilage fibrillation at the index arthroscopy did not increase the radiographic changes at follow-up, but radiographic changes were commoner after subtotal meniscectomy (7/8) than after partial meniscectomy (17/35). These findings are similar to previous studies of arthroscopic meniscectomy of medium duration and do not differ considerably from studies of open meniscectomy.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
1995. Vol. 66, no 2, 113-117 p.
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-79485DOI: 10.3109/17453679508995502OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-79485DiVA: diva2:542811
Available from: 2012-08-03 Created: 2012-08-03 Last updated: 2017-12-07Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Clinical and radiographic outcome of meniscectomy and meniscus repair in the stable knee
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Clinical and radiographic outcome of meniscectomy and meniscus repair in the stable knee
2000 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Increasing knowledge about the function of the meniscus and arthroscopy have made meniscus surgery more conservative. Arthroscopy was developed during the 70's and enabled the surgeon to select the most appropriate and tissue conserving therapy for a meniscus lesion. Arthroscopic meniscectomy and meniscus repair were introduced as new techniques for treatment of meniscus lesions.

This thesis comprises five long term follow-up studies of arthroscopic meniscectomy and open meniscus repair and one short term follow-up study of arthroscopic meniscectomy.

The long term follow-up studies include 152 patients, 113 with meniscectomy and 39 with meniscus repair, with stable knees, age less than 44 years and without preexisting gonarthrosis. All patients had a diagnostic at1hroscopy at the index operation and were evaluated clinically and radiographically 13-14 years after surgery.

At follow-up the frequency of radiographic changes was high but in general the radiographic changes were of a low grade. Only seven patients, 4 of 86 (5%) after partial meniscectomy and 3 of 27. (11%) after total meniscectomy fulfilled the criteria for gonarthrosis (minimal joint space less than 3 mm on radiographs and symptoms). More radiographic changes were found after total meniscectomy than after partial meniscectomy, meniscus repair or than in an un-injured control group. A similar rate of radiographic changes was seen when meniscus repair was compared to matched patients with partial and total meniscectomy. Knee function was in general good at follow-up and did not differ between patients with total meniscectomy and partial meniscectomy but patients with meniscus repair had a somewhat better knee function than a group of patients with partial and total meniscectomy. Cartilage fibril1ation present at meniscectomy did not influence the frequency of radiographic changes, knee function or activity at follow-up but older patients had more radiographic changes after meniscectomy than younger patients. The activity level decreased in a similar fashion over time after total meniscectomy, partial meniscectomy, meniscus repair and in un-injured subjects indicating that factors other than the knee injury and meniscus operation determines the decline in activity.

Thus, irrespective of meniscus treatment (arthroscopic partial/total meniscectomy and meniscus repair), in a 13-14 year perspective, the grade of radiographic changes in the knee joint were relatively low with no influence on activity and little influence on knee function.

In the short term follow-up study original data from patients with arthroscopic meniscectomy in the early 80' s when the technique was new was compared to similar data from patients operated today, when the technique is in routine use. The operation time was shorter and the frequency of subtotal meniscectomy was less today. In contrast to the early 80's the procedure is entirely out-patient. However, recovery and in particular return to sports were delayed today in comparison to previously.

A less supervised rehabilitation is suggested to be the main cause to the delayed recovery and a generosity with supervised rehabilitation after arthroscopic meniscectomy is advisable.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Linköping: Linköpings universitet, 2000. 60 p.
Series
Linköping University Medical Dissertations, ISSN 0345-0082 ; 616
Keyword
Arthroscopy, Meniscectomy, Meniscus Repair, Follow-up, Arthrosis
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-28071 (URN)12835 (Local ID)91-7219-573-8 (ISBN)12835 (Archive number)12835 (OAI)
Public defence
2000-02-18, Sal K3, Kåkenhus, Bredgatan 33, Campus Norrköping, Norrköping, 09:00 (Swedish)
Opponent
Available from: 2009-10-08 Created: 2009-10-08 Last updated: 2012-11-09Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Rockborn, PeterGillquist, Jan

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Rockborn, PeterGillquist, Jan
By organisation
Sports Medicine Faculty of Health SciencesDepartment of Orthopaedics in Linköping
In the same journal
Acta Orthopaedica
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 64 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf