liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
What is considered important for life balance? Similarities and differences among some working adults
Jönköping University, Sweden .
Jönköping University, Sweden .
University of Gothenburg, Sweden .
Linköping University, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Rehabilitation Medicine. Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences. Östergötlands Läns Landsting, Local Health Care Services in Central Östergötland, Habilitation in Central County.
Show others and affiliations
2012 (English)In: Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, ISSN 1103-8128, E-ISSN 1651-2014, Vol. 19, no 4, 377-384 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Life balance seems subjective, health related, and multidimensional. However, the concept is complex. Exploring what people themselves consider more or less important for their life balance and whether this differs between people would develop new knowledge. Q methodology was chosen for the present study, in which 32 working men and women without recent long-term sick leave participated. They sorted 42 statements regarding life balance according to their importance for each participants life balance. The analysis resulted in four different viewpoints concerning life balance. All four viewpoints considered good relationships with those closest to them, as well as knowing that these people were doing well, as important. Each viewpoint also showed a unique orientation towards what was considered important for life balance: occupational balance (viewpoint 1), self-actualization (viewpoint 2), self-awareness (viewpoint 3), and reciprocal relationships (viewpoint 4). The results. showed support for life balance as being a subjective, multidimensional, and health-related phenomenon. The results demonstrated the importance of relationships for life balance and heterogeneity in what people considered important for their own life balance.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Informa Healthcare , 2012. Vol. 19, no 4, 377-384 p.
Keyword [en]
western sociocultural perspective; Sweden; Q methodology; subjectivity; self-reported health
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-79689DOI: 10.3109/11038128.2011.645552ISI: 000305704400009OAI: diva2:544134
Available from: 2012-08-13 Created: 2012-08-13 Last updated: 2012-08-20

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Falkmer, Torbjörn
By organisation
Rehabilitation MedicineFaculty of Health SciencesHabilitation in Central County
In the same journal
Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 61 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link