liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Assessment of forensic findings when alternative explanations have different likelihoods—“Blame-the-brother”-syndrome
Linköping University, Department of Computer and Information Science, Statistics. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
Statens Kriminaltekniska Laboratorium, Linköping.
Linköping University, Department of Physics, Chemistry and Biology, Molecular genetics. Linköping University, The Institute of Technology.
2012 (English)In: Science & justice, ISSN 1355-0306, E-ISSN 1876-4452, Vol. 52, no 4, 226-236 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Assessment of forensic findings with likelihood ratios is for several cases straightforward, but there are a number of situations where contemplation of the alternative explanation to the evidence needs consideration, in particular when it comes to the reporting of the evidentiary strength. The likelihood ratio approach cannot be directly applied to cases where the proposition alternative to the forwarded one is a set of multiple propositions with different likelihoods and different prior probabilities. Here we present a general framework based on the Bayes' factor as the quantitative measure of evidentiary strength from which it can be deduced whether the direct application of a likelihood ratio is reasonable or not. The framework is applied on DNA evidence in forms of an extension to previously published work. With the help of a scale of conclusions we provide a solution to the problem of communicating to the court the evidentiary strength of a DNA match when a close relative to the suspect has a non-negligible prior probability of being the source of the DNA.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2012. Vol. 52, no 4, 226-236 p.
Keyword [en]
Evidence value, Bayes' factor, Multiple propositions, Scale of conclusions, DNA profiles, Relatives
National Category
Probability Theory and Statistics Law and Society
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-79765DOI: 10.1016/j.scijus.2011.12.001ISI: 000311920000004OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-79765DiVA: diva2:544220
Available from: 2012-08-13 Created: 2012-08-13 Last updated: 2017-12-07

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Nordgaard, AndersAnsell, Ricky

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Nordgaard, AndersAnsell, Ricky
By organisation
StatisticsFaculty of Arts and SciencesMolecular geneticsThe Institute of Technology
In the same journal
Science & justice
Probability Theory and StatisticsLaw and Society

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 142 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf