liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Side effects and indwelling times of subcutaneous catheters for insulin injections: a new device for injecting insulin with a minimum of pain in the treatment of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus
Linköping University, Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Pediatrics. Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences.
Linköping University, Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Pediatrics. Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences.
1990 (English)In: Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, ISSN 0168-8227, E-ISSN 1872-8227, Vol. 10, no 1, 73-83 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

For 2 months we observed side-effects and indwelling times when using a subcutaneous catheter (Insuflon, Viggo AB, Sweden) for insulin injections. This method is used by approximately 600 children and adolescents with IDDM in Sweden today. 22 children and adolescents aged 4–19 years with a diabetes duration of 4.0 ± 3.0 (mean ± SD) years participated. Their HbA1c was 5.8 ± 1.0%. All used 4–6 dosages of insulin per day. The catheter was placed subcutaneously in the abdominal wall, and replaced by parents when home tests showed increased blood or urine glucose, when the child experienced pain or when skin changes were observed. The 22 patients used 239 catheters with a mean time between changing catheters of 4.8 ± 2.2 (range 0.5 – 17) days (= 1147 catheter days). Noted side effects were (% of catheter days): fixation problems, 5.6%; minor infection/irritation (= redness > 1 mm), 5.6%; pain, 2.8%; sore skin from plastic wings, 2.4%; itching/dry skin, 2.0%; eczema from band-aid, 1.7%; blocked catheter/injection needle, 1.6%; leakage of insulin, 1.3%, transient lipohypertrophies, 1.1%; hematoma/blood in catheter, 0.8%, and moist skin, 0.3%. No major infections requiring surgical or antibiotic treatment occurred. In conclusion, the use of indwelling insulin catheters seems to be a safe method to lessen the pain of insulin injections with a low frequency of side effects. The long-term metabolic control was not altered in this group of well-controlled children. We therefore find that we can recommend the use of indwelling catheters to children and adolescents who have difficulties with injections because of needle phobia or pain, particularly when using MIT.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
1990. Vol. 10, no 1, 73-83 p.
Keyword [en]
Insulin therapy, Indwelling catheter, Multiple injection therapy, Insuflon, Injection pain
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-80246DOI: 10.1016/0168-8227(90)90084-7OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-80246DiVA: diva2:546297
Available from: 2012-08-23 Created: 2012-08-23 Last updated: 2017-12-07Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Reducing injection pain in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: Studies on indwelling catheters and injection needles
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Reducing injection pain in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: Studies on indwelling catheters and injection needles
2001 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Insulin injections can be painful for many children, especially when using multiple daily injections. To reduce this procedural pain we in 1985 designed ao indwelling catheter for subcutaneous use when injecting insulin. This catheter has been well accepted by our patients. The aims of the present studies have been to further investigate the problems of pain associated with insulin injections in children and adolescents and to study side effects, metabolic control, and insulin absorption when using indwelling catheters (Insuflon®, Maersk Medical, Lynge, Denmark). Side effects and indwelling times were studied at home using questionnaires.Injection pain and needle phobia were studied using 10 cm VAS scales. Metabolic control was studied in a 10-week crossover study and insulin absorption with the help of an uncollimated gamma camera and 125I-insulin.

The mean indwelling time was 4.8 ± 2.2 (range 0.5-17) days. Fixation problems and local redness at the insertion site were the most frequent side effects. No major infections requiring surgical or antibiotic treatment occurred. In the questionnaire of recalled pain, the VAS score of injections (median and quartiles) with syringes was 1.9 (1.1,3.5) cm, with pens 0.4 (0.2,1.3) cm, with indwelling catheters 0.4 (0.2, I. 7) cm, when taking a pump bolus dose 0.0 cm (0.0, 0.0), and when talcing a blood glucose test 0.7 (0.1, 2.4) cm. The injection pain and needle phobia declined with increasing age but some, both yOlmg children and teenagers, regarded the injection pain as almost unbearable. In the crossover study we found no significant difference between the arms with and without Insuflon in HbA1c, 24 hour profiles of blood glucose or serum free insulin. In the absorption study the patients used the same indwelling catheter for injections of short-acting insulin for 4 days. We found no significant difference in residual activity of 125 I-insulin after 60 min. or time to 50% remaining activity between injections day 1, 3 and 5, nor between catheter and ordinary injections on day 1, 3 and 5, respectively. HbA1c correlated significantly both to T-50% and residual activity of 125 I-insulin after 60 min. In the randomized multicenter study using Insuflon from the onset of diabetes, injection pain and parental pre-injection anxiety decreased from day 1-15 in both groups (in average 4.1 injections/day). Pain (median 1.7 cm vs. 2.7 cm, p=0.002) and parental pre-injection anxiety (1.2 cm vs. 2.9 cm, p=0.016) was lower for Insuflon users vs. ordinary injections. Talcing injections (including insertiug Insuflon) was found less problematic in the Insuflon group (1.6 cm vs. 3.3 cm, p=0.009). During the 6 month follow-up injection pain and injection problems were significantly lower in the Insuflon group. When comparing pen injector needles, the median VAS score ranged from 0. 7 cm to 1.2 cm in the first study where 27G and 28G needles were compared (n.s. ). In the following study, 280; 29G and 30G needles scored from 1.5 cm to 2.8 cm (n.s.). Placebo injections scored 0.1 cm (p=0.0001). Leakage of insulin was found in 14% of abdominal and 25% of thigh injections (p=0.0001) with no difference between the needles. VAS scores were higher in the later study which may be explained by the adding of faces to VAS, increasing the range of scores.

In summary, most patients find the pain when injecting insulin quite small but for some it is almost unbearable. Needle diameter is of less importance for the expedenced injection pain. When using indwelling catheters from the onset of diabetes injection pain and pre-injection anxiety can be decreased significantly. The average indwelling time is 4-5 days and the frequency of side effects is low. Using indwelling catheters for up to 4 days does not affect the absorption of shmt-acting insulin when the catheter is inserted in an area free from lipohypertrophies and the long- and short-term metabolic control is not altered. We conclude that indwelling catheters can safely be used from the onset of diabetes to lessen injection pain in children and adolescents.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Linköping: Linköping University Electronic Press, 2001. 94 p.
Series
Linköping University Medical Dissertations, ISSN 0345-0082 ; 700
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-28576 (URN)13730 (Local ID)91-7373-138-2 (ISBN)13730 (Archive number)13730 (OAI)
Public defence
2001-11-23, Berzeliussalen, Universitetssjukhuset, Linköping, 13:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2009-10-09 Created: 2009-10-09 Last updated: 2012-08-23Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Hanås, RagnarLudvigsson, Ragnar

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hanås, RagnarLudvigsson, Ragnar
By organisation
PediatricsFaculty of Health Sciences
In the same journal
Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 259 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf