liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Prototype Evaluation in Service Design: A Case Study at an Emergency Ward
Linköping University, Department of Computer and Information Science, Human-Centered systems. Linköping University, The Institute of Technology.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3547-6792
Linköping University, Department of Computer and Information Science, Human-Centered systems. Linköping University, The Institute of Technology.
2011 (English)In: Proceedings of 20th IASDR 2011, International Association of Societies of Design Research (IASDR) , 2011Conference paper, Published paper (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Prototypes based on user research are embodiments of hypotheses about how behaviour and experiences will change. The purpose of prototypes has been discussed in academic literature but in the case of service design, some of that knowledge needs to be re-examined. In Service design, one of the problems is that the impact of prototypes is complex and difficult to predict. A way to counter this dilemma is to put more focus on making the hypotheses explicit and testable. This paper presents a practical process for using designers’ hypotheses to generate survey tools for evaluating the impact of prototypes in service systems. This is also a way for designers to verbalize the purpose of service prototypes in a contextual and situated way. The tool was designed to be quick, easy, and light-weight, to suit the needs of design consultants, and it focused on measuring the experiences of a waiting room from the perspective of the visitors. The process has been applied to a project where the waiting room of an emergency ward was redesigned. The three-step process started with building up the hypothesis structure, where the designers’ assumptions and intentions were used to make a representation of the hypothesis. The next step was formulating questions, where questions that tested the hypothesis were formulated. The last step – making the questionnaire – included the selection of what information to gather and iterative testing of the questions. It was found that the designers did not have a well-defined hypothesis. The suggested process can help designers identify a contextual and situated purpose for prototypes.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
International Association of Societies of Design Research (IASDR) , 2011.
Keyword [en]
service design, prototyping, prototype evaluation
National Category
Human Computer Interaction Design
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-80366ISBN: 978-94-6190-719-6 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-80366DiVA: diva2:546608
Conference
IASDR 2011: 4th World Conference on Design Research by International Association of Societies of Design Research, and Delft University of Technology, October 31 - November 4, 2011, Delft, the Netherlands
Available from: 2012-08-24 Created: 2012-08-24 Last updated: 2015-09-22

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Authority records BETA

Blomkvist, JohanHolmlid, Stefan

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Blomkvist, JohanHolmlid, Stefan
By organisation
Human-Centered systemsThe Institute of Technology
Human Computer InteractionDesign

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 158 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf