liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Socio–technical ecology: the ideas of Hägerstrand as an analytical framework for sustainability studies
Linköping University, The Tema Institute, Technology and Social Change. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences. (Technology, everyday life, society)
2012 (English)In: Association of American Geographers Annual Meeting - Book of Abstracts, 2012Conference paper, Oral presentation with published abstract (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Today, there is an imperative to apply holistic approaches in research, but weaving parts into a whole is a challenge that few can handle. This paper builds on Hägerstrand’s perspective, what he termed socio–technical ecology, using it as an analytical framework to describe and understand habitat-related issues. Socio–technical ecology offers a foundation for research that draws attention to the material and temporal significance of the built environment for people, nature, and technology. Previous research into the built environment has called for a unified perspective, and I argue here that socio–technical ecology offers such a viable unified approach to sustainability studies of the built environment. My starting point is that research into socio–technical ecology connects people, technology, and nature, making use of theories and concepts that can be obtained from other sources. Our houses are subject to both private considerations and national policy and embody both simple and complex issues. Our identities are formed spiritually and materially in our homes, which are spaces for both solitude and social interaction. Though homes offer protection against natural elements, people often prefer to maintain some contact with nature through a surrounding garden or houseplants, and like to open windows to air out interior stuffiness and let in fresh air. Our homes bring together and interweave the human, natural, and artificial spheres, usually on people’s own terms. This does not, however, imply conflict-free relationships between people, things, and nature.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2012.
Keyword [en]
Socio-technical ecology, time-space geopgrahy, Hägerstrand
National Category
Human Geography
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-80866OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-80866DiVA: diva2:548791
Conference
Association of American Geographers Annual Meeting, February 24-28, 2012, New York, USA
Projects
The co-production of sustainable energy futures? - socio-technical regimes and worlds in the use and management of energy systems in buildings
Funder
Formas
Available from: 2012-08-31 Created: 2012-08-31 Last updated: 2012-09-10

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Authority records BETA

Glad, Wiktoria

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Glad, Wiktoria
By organisation
Technology and Social ChangeFaculty of Arts and Sciences
Human Geography

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 94 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf