liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Orthodontic treatment efficiency with self-ligating and conventional edgewise twin brackets: A prospective randomized clinical trial
Östersund Hospital, Sweden .
Östergötlands Läns Landsting, Public Dental Service, Centre for Orthodontics and Paediatric Dentistry.
2012 (English)In: Angle orthodontist, ISSN 0003-3219, Vol. 82, no 5, 929-934 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objective: To conduct a prospective and randomized study of the efficiency of orthodontic treatment with self-ligating edgewise brackets (SL; Time2 brand, American Orthodontics) and conventional edgewise twin brackets (CE; Gemini brand, 3M). less thanbrgreater than less thanbrgreater thanMaterials and Methods: One hundred consecutive patients were randomized to treatment with either SL or CE brackets. The participants were treated by one of three specialists in orthodontics and with continuous instructions alternately by five orthodontic assistants according to our normal treatment routine (ie, modified 0.022 MBT preadjusted edgewise technique). The treatments were evaluated in terms of overall treatment time, number of visits, and treatment outcome using the Index of Complexity, Outcome and Need (ICON). The number of emergency appointments, number of archwires, overjet, relative space, and extractions at treatment start were noted. less thanbrgreater than less thanbrgreater thanResults: After dropouts, the analyzed material consisted of 44 patients treated with SL (mean age 15.3 years, mean ICON 60.7, 70.4 /0 female) and 46 patients treated with CE (mean age 15.0 years, mean ICON 56.5, 71.7/0 female). There were no statistically significant differences between the SL and CE groups in terms of mean treatment time in months (20.4 vs 18.2), mean number of visits (15.5 vs 14.1), mean ICON scores after treatment (13.2 vs 11.9), or mean ICON improvement grade (7.9 vs 9.1). less thanbrgreater than less thanbrgreater thanConclusion: Orthodontic treatment with SL brackets does not reduce treatment time or number of appointments and does not affect posttreatment ICON scores or ICON improvement grade compared with CE brackets. (Angle Orthod. 2012;82:929-934.)

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
E. H. Angle Education and Research Foundation , 2012. Vol. 82, no 5, 929-934 p.
Keyword [en]
Orthodontic, Treatment efficiency, Conventional, Self-ligating
National Category
Engineering and Technology
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-85094DOI: 10.2319/101911-653.1ISI: 000308388700025OAI: diva2:564613

Funding Agencies|County Council of Jamtland, Sweden||

Available from: 2012-11-02 Created: 2012-11-02 Last updated: 2012-11-06

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text
By organisation
Centre for Orthodontics and Paediatric Dentistry
In the same journal
Angle orthodontist
Engineering and Technology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 41 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link