liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Facilitated auditory detection for speech sounds
CNRS, France.
Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United-Kingdom. (Centre for the Neural Basis of Hearing)
Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, CNRS UMR5292, INSERM U1028 , Université de Lyon, Lyon, France. (Auditory Cognition and Psychoacoustics)
Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, CNRS UMR5292, INSERM U1028 , Université de Lyon, Lyon, France. (Auditory Cognition and Psychoacoustics)
Show others and affiliations
2011 (English)In: Frontiers in Psychology, ISSN 1664-1078, E-ISSN 1664-1078, Vol. 2, no 176Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

If it is well known that knowledge facilitates higher cognitive functions, such as visual andauditory word recognition, little is known about the influence of knowledge on detection,particularly in the auditory modality. Our study tested the influence of phonological and lexicalknowledge on auditory detection. Words, pseudo-words, and complex non-phonological sounds,energetically matched as closely as possible, were presented at a range of presentation levelsfrom sub-threshold to clearly audible. The participants performed a detection task (Experiments1 and 2) that was followed by a two alternative forced-choice recognition task in Experiment2. The results of this second task in Experiment 2 suggest a correct recognition of words inthe absence of detection with a subjective threshold approach. In the detection task of bothexperiments, phonological stimuli (words and pseudo-words) were better detected than nonphonologicalstimuli (complex sounds), presented close to the auditory threshold. This findingsuggests an advantage of speech for signal detection. An additional advantage of words overpseudo-words was observed in Experiment 2, suggesting that lexical knowledge could alsoimprove auditory detection when listeners had to recognize the stimulus in a subsequenttask. Two simulations of detection performance performed on the sound signals confirmedthat the advantage of speech over non-speech processing could not be attributed to energeticdifferences in the stimuli.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2011. Vol. 2, no 176
Keyword [en]
speech detection effect, auditory threshold, recognition, model, knowledge
National Category
Psychology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-86493DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00176OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-86493DiVA: diva2:578229
Available from: 2012-12-18 Created: 2012-12-17 Last updated: 2017-12-06Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(675 kB)152 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 675 kBChecksum SHA-512
1bf0b1fa175af3322586cef0db9aa30cb5695945eed77eff3041ad485e0d66ff74c3d0cd97939a060ccb7991be88e1ed1380c59378fb9b73a9eb357e3972c88d
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Signoret, Carine

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Signoret, Carine
In the same journal
Frontiers in Psychology
Psychology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 152 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 100 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf