liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Different roles of evaluation in information systems research
Linköping University, Department of Management and Engineering, VITS - Development of Informations Systems and Work Context. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
Örebro University, Sweden.
2012 (English)Conference paper, Published paper (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Evaluation of information systems (IS) has come to be an important topic for study as well as practice. IS scholars perform studies of how to evaluate IS and different IS related phenomena, like e.g. methods and strategies. Evaluation is also used as a research approach in many IS research studies. However, the use and interest of evaluation seem to be rather fragmented and diversified in the IS field. The purpose of this paper is to bring more structure to evaluation in IS research. Based on a review of literature on evaluation in IS research and on evaluation research in general a conceptualisation of evaluation in IS is presented. This consists of 1) a conceptual practice model of evaluation (including generic questions for the design of evaluation) and 2) a classification of different roles of IS evaluation research. This classification consists of three main research types: 1) research about evaluation, 2) research through evaluation and 3) research about evaluation research. The second research type has been divided into three sub-classes: 2a) research through evaluation as main strategy, 2b) research through evaluation as companion strategy and 2c) research through evaluation as re-use strategy. The different research types have been characterized and exemplified.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2012.
Keyword [en]
Information system, evaluation, IS evaluation, evaluation research, method, criteria, action
National Category
Information Systems
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-86949OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-86949DiVA: diva2:583557
Conference
Workshop on IT Artefact Design and Workpractice Intervention, 10 June 2012, Barcelona
Available from: 2013-01-14 Created: 2013-01-08 Last updated: 2013-01-28Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(75 kB)1207 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 75 kBChecksum SHA-512
4d1ec9c673f8e623374a6ad63d6bffb98bbba6ef5860d4e9a778135934fdc36d837e257e81e95abc375917a5957cd31f0f503b6bbb49e927201e269a82fb6751
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Authority records BETA

Goldkuhl, Göran

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Goldkuhl, Göran
By organisation
VITS - Development of Informations Systems and Work ContextFaculty of Arts and Sciences
Information Systems

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 1207 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 474 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf