liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Staffs perception of abuse in healthcare: a Swedish qualitative study
Linköping University, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Gender and medicine. Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences.
Linköping University, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Gender and medicine. Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences. Östergötlands Läns Landsting, Center of Paediatrics and Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics in Linköping.
2012 (English)In: BMJ open, ISSN 2044-6055, Vol. 2, no 5Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objective The study aim was to apprehend staff's perception of abuse in healthcare (AHC) after an intervention based on ‘Forum Play’, and make comparisons to preintervention interviews and interviews with male and female patients. AHC can be described as a failing encounter from the patient's perspective.

Design Qualitative interview follow-up study.

Setting A Swedish Women's Clinic.

Participants In a preintervention study 21 staff members were interviewed. Eligible for the follow-up study were 14 informants who had participated in the intervention. Four declined participation leaving ten informants for this study.

Intervention During January 2008–January 2009, all staff members (N=136) were invited to participate in Forum Play workshops. Seventy-four participants took part in at least 1 of the 17 half-day workshops.

Primary outcome measures Staffs perception of AHC.

Results The core category, ‘a summoning stone in the shoe’, was constructed of five categories: ‘Dehumanising the patient’, ‘Unacceptable: you are bound to act!’, ‘Ubiquitous’, ‘Unintentional’ and ‘Relative’. Forum Play had demonstrated possibilities to act even in seemingly ‘impossible’ situations, and that the taboo status of AHC was altered at the clinic. When our results were compared to those in the preintervention study, we found an increased awareness about AHC, more concrete examples of AHC, a stronger empathy for patients, and fewer explanations, justifications and trivialisations of AHC.

Conclusion In this follow-up study staff's perception of AHC was closer to the patient's perspective. Compared to the preintervention interviews staff showed a greater willingness not only to acknowledge AHC, but also to take on a responsibility to act in order to stop or prevent AHC. Explanations for this stance could be that Forum Play had showed staff that there were possibilities to act, and that the taboo status of AHC had been broken at the clinic.


Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2012. Vol. 2, no 5
National Category
Engineering and Technology
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-87734DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001111OAI: diva2:600115
Available from: 2013-01-23 Created: 2013-01-22 Last updated: 2014-03-06

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(278 kB)81 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 278 kBChecksum SHA-512
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Swahnberg, KatarinaWijma, Barbro
By organisation
Gender and medicineFaculty of Health SciencesDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics in Linköping
Engineering and Technology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 81 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 105 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link