liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Coronary heart disease in primary care: accuracy of medical history and physical findings in patients with chest pain - a study protocol for a systematic review with individual patient data
University of Marburg, Germany .
University of Louvain, Belgium .
University of Marburg, Germany .
Katholieke University of Leuven, Belgium .
Show others and affiliations
2012 (English)In: BMC Family Practice, ISSN 1471-2296, Vol. 13, no 81Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Chest pain is a common complaint in primary care, with coronary heart disease (CHD) being the most concerning of many potential causes. Systematic reviews on the sensitivity and specificity of symptoms and signs summarize the evidence about which of them are most useful in making a diagnosis. Previous meta-analyses are dominated by studies of patients referred to specialists. Moreover, as the analysis is typically based on study-level data, the statistical analyses in these reviews are limited while meta-analyses based on individual patient data can provide additional information. Our patient-level meta-analysis has three unique aims. First, we strive to determine the diagnostic accuracy of symptoms and signs for myocardial ischemia in primary care. Second, we investigate associations between study-or patient-level characteristics and measures of diagnostic accuracy. Third, we aim to validate existing clinical prediction rules for diagnosing myocardial ischemia in primary care. This article describes the methods of our study and six prospective studies of primary care patients with chest pain. Later articles will describe the main results. less thanbrgreater than less thanbrgreater thanMethods/Design: We will conduct a systematic review and IPD meta-analysis of studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of symptoms and signs for diagnosing coronary heart disease in primary care. We will perform bivariate analyses to determine the sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratios of individual symptoms and signs and multivariate analyses to explore the diagnostic value of an optimal combination of all symptoms and signs based on all data of all studies. We will validate existing clinical prediction rules from each of the included studies by calculating measures of diagnostic accuracy separately by study. less thanbrgreater than less thanbrgreater thanDiscussion: Our study will face several methodological challenges. First, the number of studies will be limited. Second, the investigators of original studies defined some outcomes and predictors differently. Third, the studies did not collect the same standard clinical data set. Fourth, missing data, varying from partly missing to fully missing, will have to be dealt with. Despite these limitations, we aim to summarize the available evidence regarding the diagnostic accuracy of symptoms and signs for diagnosing CHD in patients presenting with chest pain in primary care. less thanbrgreater than less thanbrgreater thanReview registration: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (University of York): CRD42011001170

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BioMed Central , 2012. Vol. 13, no 81
Keyword [en]
MeSH, Chest pain, Myocardial ischemia, Medical history taking, Sensitivity and specificity, Primary health care
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-88468DOI: 10.1186/1471-2296-13-81ISI: 000313518200001OAI: diva2:604020

Funding Agencies|Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF)|FKZ 01GK0920|

Available from: 2013-02-07 Created: 2013-02-07 Last updated: 2014-09-10

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(283 kB)106 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 283 kBChecksum SHA-512
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Nilsson, Staffan
By organisation
General PracticeFaculty of Health SciencesEast County Primary Health Care
In the same journal
BMC Family Practice
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 106 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 40 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link