liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Life cycle assessment of floor care: A comparative study of the Twister™ method and floor care methods using polish and wax
Linköping University, Department of Management and Engineering, Environmental Technology and Management. Linköping University, The Institute of Technology.
Linköping University, Department of Management and Engineering, Environmental Technology and Management. Linköping University, The Institute of Technology.
Linköping University, Department of Management and Engineering, Environmental Technology and Management. Linköping University, The Institute of Technology.
2009 (English)Report (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

In Today’s society there are a wide variety of floor and floor materials. An extensive range of products and methods are also used to ensure that these floors remain functional. All floor types and products create environmental impact of various kinds and magnitudes.

This study was initiated by the authors in order to evaluate the Twister™- method’s environmental pros and cons in relation to other traditional floor care methods. This has been ascertained through a Life Cycle Assessment which was conducted within the study. The study has been in co-operation with HTC Sweden AB, the developer of the Twister™- method.

A Life Cycle Assessment helps to identify and quantify the environmental impact of a product or a service, from a holistic perspective, which incorporates extraction of materials, their manufacture, use and waste management. The software application SimaPRo 7.0 has been used in this study, from which the Eco-indicator 99 method has been selected.

In the study, the Twister™ method is compared with other floor care methods using polish and wax. The analysis also includes a breakdown of the Twister™ method, as well as a breakdown of the Twister™ pad manufactured by HTC Sweden AB.

The results show that the elements of the Twister™ method with the greatest environmental impact are the scrubbing machine that is used and the energy consumption that the Twister™ method requires. The results also show that the Twister™ method has a significantly lower environmental impact than floor care methods using polish or wax. The parts of the Twister™ pad that have the greatest environmental impact are the industrial diamonds and the  material that makes up the pad.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Linköping: Linköping University Electronic Press, 2009. , 72 p.
National Category
Engineering and Technology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-88931OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-88931DiVA: diva2:606331
Available from: 2013-02-19 Created: 2013-02-19 Last updated: 2013-02-19Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

Life cycle assessment of floor care: A comparative study of the Twister™ method and floor care methods using polish and wax(258 kB)546 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 258 kBChecksum SHA-512
f721dcfc89382954555a5095f1cec279e8fb5dcfaa1885cf81b7143d8100125dc1ac3c9abad34bd61fdd6baea768b4658406a40dec96ecde3c1893c94754e61c
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Swedish version/Svensk version

Authority records BETA

Lindahl, MattiasSvensson, Niclas

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lindahl, MattiasSvensson, Niclas
By organisation
Environmental Technology and ManagementThe Institute of Technology
Engineering and Technology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 546 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 133 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf