liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Considering start-ups and shutdowns using an optimisation tool – Including a dairy production planning case study
Linköping University, Department of Management and Engineering, Energy Systems. Linköping University, The Institute of Technology.
Linköping University, Department of Management and Engineering, Energy Systems. Linköping University, The Institute of Technology.
2013 (English)In: Applied Energy, ISSN 0306-2619, E-ISSN 1872-9118, Vol. 107, 338-349 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

There are many different aspects a production-planning model has to be able to handle to make a model adequate for the purpose. One aspect is the handling of start-ups and shutdowns for different processes. The production plan is likely to be changed when considering, for example, a cost connected to the start-up and/or shutdown of processes. Besides costs associated with start-ups and shutdowns, waste may be produced during the start-up and shutdown. However, there is also the possibility of carrying out soft start-ups and shutdowns or limiting the number of start-ups and shutdowns. Thus, start-ups and shutdowns have to be handled in an adequate way in models to produce reliable and accurate results. In optimisation tools, this may be dealt with by introducing certain constraints, including integers. In this paper, the implementation of alternative ways to consider start-ups and shutdowns are presented. This is done in the energy system optimisation tool reMIND, which deals with Mixed Integer Linear Programming (MILP) problems. The purpose of this paper is to show four alternatives to consider start-ups and shutdowns in optimisation models. This involves, in total, almost 50 constraints. Also, a simple dairy case study is included in the paper to visualise the effect of implementing the different alternatives to shutdowns.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier , 2013. Vol. 107, 338-349 p.
Keyword [en]
MILP, Optimisation, Production planning, Start-up, Shutdown
National Category
Engineering and Technology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-93954DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.02.050ISI: 000318456700030OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-93954DiVA: diva2:628300
Note

Funding Agencies|Swedish Energy Agency (SEA)||

Available from: 2013-06-13 Created: 2013-06-13 Last updated: 2017-12-06

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1746 kB)299 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1746 kBChecksum SHA-512
823e9b9171fa55ae67c7330b6e5ef64b7c21b17094bfe353d8735b48c156d335e800277ace4e0e13d2c2ac4c9cfdb3d63095a90cda79e19c15fced8a19de7f4e
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Karlsson, MagnusMardan, Nawzad

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Karlsson, MagnusMardan, Nawzad
By organisation
Energy SystemsThe Institute of Technology
In the same journal
Applied Energy
Engineering and Technology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 299 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 124 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf