liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Intuition and cooperation reconsidered
Linköping University, Department of Management and Engineering, Economics. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences. Linköping University, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Division of Health Care Analysis. Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences. (Beteende och Neuroekonomi)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8159-1249
Linköping University, Department of Management and Engineering, Economics. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
University of Innsbruck, Austria.
Klarna AB, Stockholm, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2013 (English)In: Nature, ISSN 0028-0836, E-ISSN 1476-4687, Vol. 498, no 7452, E1-E2 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Rand et al.1 reported increased cooperation in social dilemmas after forcing individuals to decide quickly1. Time pressure was used to induce intuitive decisions, and they concluded that intuition promotes cooperation. We test the robustness of this finding in a series of five experiments involving about 2,500 subjects in three countries. None of the experiments confirms the Rand et al.1 finding, indicating that their result was an artefact of excluding the about 50% of subjects who failed to respond on time.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Nature Publishing Group, 2013. Vol. 498, no 7452, E1-E2 p.
Keyword [en]
Human Cooperation, Intuition; Time Pressure; Public Goods; Behavioral Economics
National Category
Economics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-94022DOI: 10.1038/nature12194ISI: 000319947800001PubMedID: 23739429OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-94022DiVA: diva2:629285
Projects
Neuroekonomi
Available from: 2013-06-16 Created: 2013-06-14 Last updated: 2017-12-06Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Deciding Fast and Slow: How Intuitive and Reflective Thinking Influence Decision Making
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Deciding Fast and Slow: How Intuitive and Reflective Thinking Influence Decision Making
2016 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Paper I “Intuition and cooperation reconsidered”: Does intuition make people more cooperative? Rand et al. (Rand, Greene, & Nowak, 2012) reported increased cooperation in social dilemmas after forcing individuals to decide quickly. We test the robustness of this finding in a series of five experiments involving about 2,500 subjects in three countries. None of the experiments confirms the Rand et al. (2012) finding, indicating that their result was an artefact of excluding about 50% of the subjects who failed to respond on time.

Paper II “Intuition and moral decision-making – the effect of time pressure and cognitive load on moral judgment and altruistic behavior”: Do individuals intuitively favor certain moral actions over others? This study explores the role of intuitive thinking — induced by time pressure and cognitive load — in moral judgment and behavior. Overall we find converging evidence that intuitive states do not influence moral decisions. Across all samples and decision tasks men were more likely to make utilitarian moral judgments and act selfishly compared to women, providing further evidence that there are robust gender differences in moral decision-making.

Paper III “Public views on policies involving nudges”: When should nudging be deemed as permissible and when should it be deemed as intrusive to individuals’ freedom of choice? The main objective of this study is to elicit public views on the use of nudges in policy. In particular we investigate attitudes toward two broad categories of nudges that we label pro-self (i.e. focusing on private welfare) and pro-social (i.e. focusing on social welfare) nudges. Results show that the level of acceptance toward nudge-policies was generally high. Nudge polices classified as pro-social had a significantly lower acceptance rate compared to pro-self nudges.

Paper IV “The effect of fast and slow decisions on financial risk-taking”: Are individuals financial risk taking influenced by time available? We experimentally compare fast and slow decisions in a series of experiments on financial risk taking in three countries involving over 1,700 subjects. We find that time pressure increases risk aversion for gains and risk taking for losses compared to time delay; implying that time pressure increase the reflection effect of Prospect Theory.

Paper V “Incidental effect and financial risk-taking – a neural investigation: This study builds on the results from Paper IV. Here I explore the influence of incidental negative emotions on financial risk-taking in an fMRI environment in order to assess underlying neural mechanisms. I experimentally compare neutral and unpleasant valence framing on gambles involving pure monetary gain and pure monetary loss. I find a significantly increased BOLD response in left amygdala and bilateral visual cortex when contrasting when showing unpleasant pictures, a neural effect which is in line with previous neuroimaging studies on negative emotions. However the neural effect of showing unpleasant pictures did not affect choices in the risk tasks. Consequently, I did not find any support for the hypothesis that the reflection effect of Prospect theory should be more pronounced when making risky choices influenced by incidental negative emotions.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Linköping: Linköping University Electronic Press, 2016. 13 p.
Series
Linköping Studies in Arts and Science, ISSN 0282-9800 ; 698
Keyword
Dual-process Theory, Experimental economics, Intuition, Reflection, Emotion, Time pressure, Nudge
National Category
Economics
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-131753 (URN)9789176856680 (ISBN)
Public defence
2016-11-03, ACAS, Entrance 17, Building A, Campus Valla, Linköping, 13:15 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Note

Ragnar Söderberg foundation has funding this Ph.D. thesis.

Available from: 2016-10-03 Created: 2016-10-03 Last updated: 2016-10-06Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records BETA

Tinghög, GustavAndersson, DavidJosephson, CamillaVästfjäll, DanielJohannesson, Magnus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Tinghög, GustavAndersson, DavidJosephson, CamillaVästfjäll, DanielJohannesson, Magnus
By organisation
EconomicsFaculty of Arts and SciencesDivision of Health Care AnalysisFaculty of Health SciencesDepartment of Behavioural Sciences and Learning
In the same journal
Nature
Economics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 1053 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf