liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Segmentation Validation Framework
Linköping University, Department of Biomedical Engineering. Linköping University, Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization, CMIV. Linköping University, The Institute of Technology.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8885-9642
2013 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (Two Years)), 20 credits / 30 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

Many segmentation algorithms have been published in literature. Accurate assessment of these algorithms is needed in order to gain acceptance in the clinical practice or compare different algorithms. However in medical imaging segmentation field, there is usually a lack of gold standard method. In many studies, the manual segmentation from expert raters is regarded as the gold standard. Even though these manual denotation methods suffer from high inter-rater and intra-rater variability.

In this thesis, a relatively complete segmentation validation framework was developed, which uses the “Simultaneous Truth and Performance Level Estimation” (STAPLE) method to produce the ground truth from a set of manual expert segmentations, and performs a set of quantitative validation metrics measurement to assess the automated segmentation versus the ground truth given by STAPLE. It is also designed to be easy-to-use and cover most common image formats and popular operating systems. A number of tests using synthetic data have proved the accuracy of the proposed framework. In addition, some examples of how this framework can be used to evaluate the performance of different segmentation algorithm are also presented.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2013. , 53 p.
Keyword [en]
Segmentation, Validation framework, Simultaneous Truth and Performance Level Estimation (STAPLE), Ground truth, ITK, Similarity metrics, Distance metrics
National Category
Medical Image Processing Medical Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-94231ISRN: LiTH-IMT/MASTER-EX--13/026--SEOAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-94231DiVA: diva2:631210
Subject / course
Master's Program Biomedical Engineering
Presentation
2013-06-12, Wrannesalen at CMIV, Linköpings universitet/US,SE-581 85, Linköping, 10:00 (English)
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2013-06-20 Created: 2013-06-19 Last updated: 2013-06-24Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

Segmentation Validation Framework(1020 kB)1513 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 1020 kBChecksum SHA-512
1471a8c20b53d7cb7cc3ae08a0168c5cc5234e8b75ce09ea4d3222e66d945a5321e948dfaed41a19df0f47cfc358ffc084b9ef3fbe114dc98eb977b21c5b1695
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Safarzadeh Khooshabi, Ghazaleh
By organisation
Department of Biomedical EngineeringCenter for Medical Image Science and Visualization, CMIVThe Institute of Technology
Medical Image ProcessingMedical Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 1522 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 1259 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf