liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Auditory Distraction Compromises Random Generation: Falling Back Into Old Habits?
University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK.
Linköping University, The Swedish Institute for Disability Research. Linköping University, Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Disability Research. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences. University of Gävle, Sweden .
University of Gävle, Sweden .
University of Gävle, Sweden .
Show others and affiliations
2013 (English)In: Experimental psychology (Göttingen), ISSN 1618-3169, E-ISSN 2190-5142, Vol. 60, no 4, 279-292 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Auditory distraction of random generation - a quintessentially executive control task - was explored in three experiments. Random number generation was impaired by the mere presence of irrelevant auditory sequences that comprise digits, but not letters, and then only if the digits were heard in a canonical order (1, 2, 3 ... or 3, 2, 1 ...), not in random order (Experiments 1 and 2). Random letter generation was impaired by irrelevant letters heard in alphabetical order (a, b, c ...) and reversed alphabetical order (i, h, g ...), but not by numbers in canonical order or letters in random order (Experiment 3). Attempting to ignore canonical sequences - with items that are members of the same category as the to-be-generated items - reduced the randomness of the generated sequence, by decreasing the tendency to change the direction of the produced sequence for random number generation, and by increasing resampling of responses for random letter generation. Like other selective attention tasks, the cost of distraction to random generation appears to stem from preventing habitual responses assuming the control of action.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Hogrefe Publishing , 2013. Vol. 60, no 4, 279-292 p.
Keyword [en]
distraction, executive control, random generation, response schemata
National Category
Psychology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-95983DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000198ISI: 000321576200007OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-95983DiVA: diva2:639985
Available from: 2013-08-12 Created: 2013-08-12 Last updated: 2017-12-06Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Sörqvist, Patrik

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Sörqvist, Patrik
By organisation
The Swedish Institute for Disability ResearchDisability ResearchFaculty of Arts and Sciences
In the same journal
Experimental psychology (Göttingen)
Psychology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 58 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf