liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Methodological quality in clinical trials and bibliometric indicators: no evidence of correlations
Swedish Council Health Technology Assessment SBU, Sweden .
Swedish Council Health Technology Assessment SBU, Sweden .
Gothenburg University, Sweden Sahlgrens University Hospital, Sweden .
Linköping University, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Division of Health Care Analysis. Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences.
Show others and affiliations
2013 (English)In: Scientometrics, ISSN 0138-9130, E-ISSN 1588-2861, Vol. 96, no 1, 297-303 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Citation frequencies and journal impact factors (JIFs) are being used more and more to assess the quality of research and allocate research resources. If these bibliometric indicators are not an adequate predictor of research quality, there could be severe negative consequences for research. To analyse to which extent citation frequencies and journal impact factors correlate with the methodological quality of clinical research articles included in an SBU systematic review of antibiotic prophylaxis in surgery. All 212 eligible original articles were extracted from the SBU systematic review "Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Surgery" and categorized according to their methodological rigourness as high, moderate or low quality articles. Median of citation frequencies and JIFs were compared between the methodological quality groups using Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric test. An in-depth study of low-quality studies with higher citation frequencies/JIFs was also conducted. No significant differences were found in median citation frequencies (p = 0.453) or JIFs (p = 0.185) between the three quality groups. Studies that had high citation frequencies/JIFs but were assessed as low-quality lacked control groups, had high dropout rates or low internal validity. This study of antibiotic prophylaxis in surgery does not support the hypothesis that bibliometric indicators are a valid instrument for assessing methodological quality in clinical trials. This is a worrying observation, since bibliometric indicators have a major influence on research funding. However, further studies in other areas are needed.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer Verlag (Germany) / Akad�miai Kiad� , 2013. Vol. 96, no 1, 297-303 p.
Keyword [en]
Bibliometric analysis; Citations; Impact factor; Study quality; HTA
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-96466DOI: 10.1007/s11192-013-0949-0ISI: 000320401500018OAI: diva2:642925
Available from: 2013-08-23 Created: 2013-08-20 Last updated: 2013-08-23

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Davidson, Thomas
By organisation
Division of Health Care AnalysisFaculty of Health Sciences
In the same journal
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 56 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link