liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
A Two Element Phased Array Coil Enabling Widespread Application of High Resolution MR Coronary Angiography
Stanford University Hospital, CA, USA.
Stanford University, CA, USA.
Linköping University, Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization (CMIV). Linköping University, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Clinical Physiology. Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences. Östergötlands Läns Landsting, Heart Centre, Department of Cardiology.
Stanford University, CA, USA.
Show others and affiliations
2009 (English)In: The Open Cardiovascular Imaging Journal, ISSN 1876-5386, Vol. 1, 30-38 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Parallel imaging using sophisticated receiver coils has improved the clinical feasibility of magnetic resonance coronary angiography (MRCA). These techniques, however, are not readily available outside advanced imaging centers. Our custom-made 2-element phased array coil is readily and inexpensively assembled to address this limitation and enable the widespread application of MRCA. The 2-element phased array coil, comprised of two 4-inch, overlapping circular coils, is specifically designed for MRCA. We compare our prototype coil to two commercially available coils commonly used for MRCA. MRCA has been performed in 14 normal volunteers. Anatomic coverage, image quality, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) are calculated for each coil. The prototype coil has imaged 92.6% (125/135) of the segments compared to 83.7% (113/135) and 76.3% (103/135) (p = 0.002) using the surface coil and cardiac phased array coil, respectively. Excellent or good (grade 1-2) image quality has been attained in 85.9% (116/135) of all the coronary segments using the prototype coil compared to 77.0% (104/135) and 71 % (96/135) using the surface and cardiac phased array coils, respectively (p = 0.025). Overall, higher SNR and CNR have been achieved by the prototype coil compared to the surface and the cardiac phased array coils (SNR: 13.5 ± 5.3 vs 12.2 ± 3.7 vs 9.0 ± 3.1 and CNR: 7.5 ± 5.5 vs 6.2 ± 3.3 vs 3.7 ± 2.7, respectively). Compared to two commercially available coils, the 2-element phased array coil is associated with overall improved SNR and CNR and provides higher image quality with wider anatomic coverage.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Bentham Open , 2009. Vol. 1, 30-38 p.
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-100118DOI: 10.2174/1876538600901010030OAI: diva2:659643
Available from: 2013-10-26 Created: 2013-10-26 Last updated: 2013-11-06Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Engvall, Jan
By organisation
Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization (CMIV)Clinical PhysiologyFaculty of Health SciencesDepartment of Cardiology
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 40 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link