liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Management Initiation of Continuous Improvement from a Motivational Perspective
Linköping University, Department of Management and Engineering, Quality Technology and Management. Linköping University, The Institute of Technology.
Linköping University, Department of Management and Engineering, Quality Technology and Management. Linköping University, The Institute of Technology.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4040-8302
2013 (English)In: Journal of Applied Economics and Business Research, ISSN 1927-033X, E-ISSN 1927-033X, Vol. 3, no 2, 81-94 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Many continuous improvement (CI) initiatives fail since management is unsuccessful in motivating the employees to actively participate in CI activities. In such cases CI often is run by managers and the power of wide participation is lost. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the mechanisms behind motivating employees to participate in CI work. The paper is based on findings from three different cases of highly successful CI organizations within different areas. The findings are that the mechanisms behind motivation for CI can be divided into respect for people and improvement system organization. Within respect for people, there need to be meaningfulness and trust, employees need to be seen as individuals, be given problem based training and education, and be given increased authority and responsibility. Within the organization of the improvement system, crucial areas are: Communication; visualization; and cross-functional, cross-professional improvement work. The paper not only shows which areas are important but explains why they are important from a motivation-theory perspective.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Journal of Applied Economics and Business Research , 2013. Vol. 3, no 2, 81-94 p.
Keyword [en]
Motivation, Continuous improvement, Lean production
National Category
Engineering and Technology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-100162OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-100162DiVA: diva2:660557
Available from: 2013-10-30 Created: 2013-10-30 Last updated: 2017-12-06Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Towards Sustainable Improvement Systems
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Towards Sustainable Improvement Systems
2013 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Improvements in general and sustainable improvements in particular are problematic areas. The failure rate is high, figures in the vicinity of 70 percent are often mentioned, but why is it so difficult to achieve sustainable improvement systems? The purpose of this dissertation is to contribute to understanding of the process and its mechanisms in creating a sustainable improvement system. The research questions are:

  • What is the process for creating a sustainable improvement system?
  • hat mechanisms influence the sustainability of improvement systems?
  • How do the different mechanisms influence the sustainability of improvement systems?

This dissertation is beyond searching for critical success factors for sustainable improvement systems but rather to identify and investigate mechanisms. Since mechanisms operate within a specific system they are by definition context dependent which critical success factors are not.

The method used to fulfil the purpose was a series of case studies. In total 13 cases has been studied through interviews, participating in meetings, working in the organisation and shadowing.

The research showed that there are major differences between different organisations in how they achieve a sustainable improvement system, despite this it was possible to a build a generic model. The model consists of three phases and three states.

The phases are initiation-transition-sustain. Each phase has a certain state that need to be reached before the next phase can start. The first state which is the outcome of the first phase is that the employees regard the changes as beneficial for them. The second state is that the employees have changed their thinking and behaviour and the third state is that the improvement system is sustainable.

Abstract [sv]

Förbättringar i allmänhet och uthålliga förbättringar i synnerhet är problematiska områden. Andelen misslyckanden är hög, siffror kring 70 procent nämns ofta, men varför är det svårt att uppnå långsiktigt uthålliga förbättringar och förbättringssystem? Syftet med denna avhandling är att bidra till förståelse av processen för att skapa långsiktigt uthålliga förbättringssystem. Forskningsfrågorna är:

  • Vilken är processen för att skapa ett uthålligt förbättringssystem?
  • Vilka mekanismer påverkar uthålligheten hos förbättringssystem?
  • Hur påverkar de olika mekanismerna förbättringssystemens uthållighet?

Denna avhandling går bortom att söka efter kritiska framgångsfaktorer för långsiktigt uthålliga förbättringssystem utan identifierar och undersöker mekanismer. Eftersom mekanismer verkar i ett specifikt system är de definitionsmässigt kontextuella vilket kritiska framgångsfaktorer inte är.

Metoden som använts för att uppfylla syftet är en serie fallstudier. Totalt 13 fall har studerats genom intervjuer, deltagande i möten, arbete i organisationen och skuggning.

Avhandlingen visar att det finns stora skillnader mellan hur olika organisationer uppnår långsiktigt uthålliga förbättringssystem, trots detta var det möjligt att bygga en generell modell, denna består av tre faser och tre tillstånd. Faserna är initiering överföring uthållighet. Varje fas har ett speciellt tillstånd som behöver uppnås innan nästa fas kan börja. Det första tillståndet är att de anställda ser förbättringarna som positiva för dem. Det andra tillståndet är att de anställda har förändrat sitt tankesätt och beteende. Det tredje tillståndet är ett uthålligt förbättringssystem.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Linköping: Linköping University Electronic Press, 2013. 65 p.
Series
Linköping Studies in Science and Technology. Dissertations, ISSN 0345-7524 ; 1552
National Category
Engineering and Technology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-100165 (URN)10.3384/diss.diva-100165 (DOI)978-91-7519-487-5 (ISBN)
Public defence
2013-11-29, A2, A-huset, Campus Valla, Linköpings universitet, Linköping, 10:15 (Swedish)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2013-10-30 Created: 2013-10-30 Last updated: 2015-01-19Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Link to article

Authority records BETA

Swartling, DagPoksinska, Bozena

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Swartling, DagPoksinska, Bozena
By organisation
Quality Technology and ManagementThe Institute of Technology
In the same journal
Journal of Applied Economics and Business Research
Engineering and Technology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 370 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf