liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Levels of epitope-specific autoantibodies correlate with renal damage in anti-GBM disease
Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Nephrology, Peking University and Key Laboratory of Renal disease, Ministry of Health of China, Beijing, People's Republic of China .
Department of Nephrology, Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden .
Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Nephrology, Peking University and Key Laboratory of Renal disease, Ministry of Health of China, Beijing, People's Republic of China .
Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Nephrology, Peking University and Key Laboratory of Renal disease, Ministry of Health of China, Beijing, People's Republic of China .
Show others and affiliations
2009 (English)In: Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation, ISSN 0931-0509, E-ISSN 1460-2385, Vol. 24, no 6, 1838-1844 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background. Although the clinical importance of demonstrating the presence of anti-glomerular basement membrane (anti-GBM) antibodies is well established, less is known concerning the clinical utility of measuring the levels of autoantibodies. Two conformational epitopes of anti-GBM antibodies have been defined at residues 17–31 and 127–141 of the α3(IV)NC1 domain of type IV collagen [α3(IV)NC1], which were named as EA and EB, respectively. In order to elucidate the importance of such antibodies, we studied the levels and the epitope specificities of anti-GBM antibodies in a large cohort of Chinese patients with anti-GBM disease.

Methods. All patients, with anti-GBM disease and available clinical data, diagnosed at Peking University First Hospital from 1996 to 2005 were included in the present study. Recombinant chimeric proteins containing previously defined epitope regions designated as EA and EB were used to detect anti-GBM antibodies by ELISA. Results were compared and correlated with clinical data collected at the time of diagnosis, biopsy findings and outcome after 1 year of follow-up.

Results. A retrospective diagnosis of anti-GBM disease was made in 147 patients. Haemoptysis was recorded for 47% of these cases while 53.5% cases had oliguria or anuria at the time of diagnosis. Among these patients, the levels of anti-GBM antibodies correlated with serum creatinine at diagnosis (P < 0.05 for anti EA, EB and α3(IV)NC1). Oliguric patients had higher levels of autoantibodies than non-oliguric patients, however, the difference being statistically significant only for EB (P < 0.05). Renal biopsies were performed in 66 patients, and it was found that 50 (75.8%) had cresent formation in >85% of the glomeruli. There was a correlation between the percentage of crescents and levels of antibodies, but it was significant only for anti-EA antibodies (P < 0.05). Clinical data regarding the follow-up were available for 102 patients; at the end of 1 year, 88 (86.3%) were either dead or dialysis dependent. The absorbance values of anti-GBM antibodies against both EA and EB were also associated with the subsequent development, death or terminal renal insufficiency (P < 0.05).

Conclusion. In this study, patients with high levels of circulating antibodies against the specific epitopes EA and EB had a more severe renal disease at diagnosis as well as a worse prognosis.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2009. Vol. 24, no 6, 1838-1844 p.
Keyword [en]
anti-GBM: clinical feature: epitope: outcome
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-101572DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfn761ISI: 000266355500022OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-101572DiVA: diva2:666528
Available from: 2013-11-22 Created: 2013-11-22 Last updated: 2017-12-06Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Segelmark, Mårten

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Segelmark, Mårten
In the same journal
Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 69 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf