liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Two surgeons and the ECG: A double blind study
Linköping University, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine. Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences. Östergötlands Läns Landsting, Local Health Care Services in Central Östergötland, Department of Acute Health Care in Linköping.
2012 (English)In: Journal of acute disease, ISSN 2221-6189, Vol. 1, no 1, 13-17 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objective

To assess the capability of operating abdominal and orthopaedic surgeons to analyze a set of standardized ECG.

Methods

Twenty operating abdominal and orthopaedic surgeons at a university hospital were included. Each participant analyzed a set of five standardized ECG with an answering scheme for eight different items, giving a maximum score of 40. The answers were matched according to specialty and experience of the doctors of less than 5 years, between 5 and 10 years or more than 10 years. The reference standard was set by two independent consultants in cardiology.

Results

The mean overall score was 25.25 (63.13%±4.78%) varying between 38 (95%) and 20(50%). Abdominal surgeons performed a mean score of 27.625 (69.06%±9.53%), and orthopaedic surgeons 23.67 points (59.17%±3.69%). The difference between the performance of abdominal and orthopaedic surgeons was not significant (P=0.09). 20/20 surgeons identified ST-elevation and no surgeon accepted the ECG showing acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction as normal.

Conclusions

Abdominal and orthopaedic surgeons provided an answering scheme are able to interprete the ECG and identify both the normal and the ECG showing life-threatening pathology. The hypothesis that surgeons were unable to interprete the ECG must be rejected.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Hainan, China: Hainan Medical University , 2012. Vol. 1, no 1, 13-17 p.
Keyword [en]
ECG; Electrocardiography; Abdominal surgeon; Orthopaedic surgeon; Double blind
National Category
Clinical Medicine
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-102675DOI: 10.1016/S2221-6189(13)60046-3OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-102675DiVA: diva2:680765
Available from: 2013-12-18 Created: 2013-12-18 Last updated: 2015-11-18Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textLink to article

Authority records BETA

Schilling, Ulf Martin

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Schilling, Ulf Martin
By organisation
Department of Clinical and Experimental MedicineFaculty of Health SciencesDepartment of Acute Health Care in Linköping
Clinical Medicine

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 52 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf