liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Guidelines in the management of obstructing cancer of the left colon: consensus conference of the world society of emergency surgery (WSES) and peritoneum and surgery (PnS) society
1st Unit of General Surgery, Ospedali Riuniti di Bergamo, Italy .
Linköping University, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Surgery. Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences.
Department of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, University of Bologna, Italy.
Unit of General, Emergency and Transplant Surgery, St Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, Bologna, Italy.
Show others and affiliations
2010 (English)In: World Journal of Emergency Surgery, ISSN 1749-7922, E-ISSN 1749-7922, Vol. 5, 29- p.Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Obstructive left colon carcinoma (OLCC) is a challenging matter in terms of obstruction release as well of oncological issues. Several options are available and no guidelines are established. The paper aims to generate evidenced based recommendations on management of OLCC. Methods: The PubMed and Cochrane Library databases were queried for publications focusing on OLCC published prior to April 2010. A extensive retrieval, analyses, and grading of the literature was undertaken. The findings of the research were presented and largely discussed among panellist and audience at the Consensus Conference of the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) and Peritoneum and Surgery (PnS) Society held in Bologna July 2010. Comparisons of techniques are presented and final committee recommendation are enounced. Results: Hartmann's procedure should be preferred to loop colostomy (Grade 2B). Hartmann's procedure offers no survival benefit compared to segmental colonic resection with primary anastomosis (Grade 2C+); Hartmann's procedure should be considered in patients with high surgical risk (Grade 2C). Total colectomy and segmental colectomy with intraoperative colonic irrigation are associated with same mortality/morbidity, however total colectomy is associated with higher rates impaired bowel function (Grade 1A). Segmental resection and primary anastomosis either with manual decompression or intraoperative colonic irrigation are associated with same mortality/morbidity rate (Grade 1A). In palliation stent placement is associated with similar mortality/morbidity rates and shorter hospital stay (Grade 2B). Stents as a bridge to surgery seems associated with lower mortality rate, shorter hospital stay, and a lower colostomy formation rate (Grade 1B). Conclusions: Loop colostomy and staged procedure should be adopted in case of dramatic scenario, when neoadjuvant therapy could be expected. Hartmann's procedure should be performed in case of high risk of anastomotic dehiscence. Subtotal and total colectomy should be attempted when cecal perforation or in case of synchronous colonic neoplasm. Primary resection and anastomosis with manual decompression seems the procedure of choice. Colonic stents represent the best option when skills are available. The literature power is relatively poor and the existing RCT are often not sufficiently robust in design thus, among 6 possible treatment modalities, only 2 reached the Grade A.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
London, UK: BioMed Central, 2010. Vol. 5, 29- p.
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-103168DOI: 10.1186/1749-7922-5-29ISI: 000208744600029OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-103168DiVA: diva2:687387
Available from: 2014-01-14 Created: 2014-01-14 Last updated: 2017-12-06Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(658 kB)344 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 658 kBChecksum SHA-512
5799b921940e63c37581c9467c52655b0cf2bb5b43bfae8598030b18eed2bc031eef0bc274162fe9a6f008fb026e6a73ce83141181ba12d15762a7900e67b3b2
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Andersson, Roland E.

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Andersson, Roland E.
By organisation
SurgeryFaculty of Health Sciences
In the same journal
World Journal of Emergency Surgery
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 344 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 92 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf