liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Reproductive choice, enhancement, and the moral continuum argument
Linköping University, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Division of Health and Society. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3071-9609
2014 (English)In: Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, ISSN 0360-5310, E-ISSN 1744-5019, Vol. 39, no 1, 41-54 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

It is often argued that it does not matter morally whether biomedical interventions treat or prevent diseases or enhance nondisease traits; what matters is whether and how much they promote well-being. Therapy and enhancement both promote well-being, the argument goes, so they are not morally distinct but instead continuous. I provide three reasons why this argument should be rejected when it is applied to choices concerning the genetic makeup of future people. First, it rests on too simple a conception of the badness of disease. Second, it wrongly assumes that disease avoidance and enhancement can proceed with similar accuracy. Third, it overlooks that disease avoidance tends to be more urgent than enhancement from the point of view of distributive justice. Although none of these reasons establishes a firm therapy-enhancement distinction, they show that a continuum model is not an attractive alternative.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Oxford University Press, 2014. Vol. 39, no 1, 41-54 p.
Keyword [en]
enhancement, reproductive choice, therapy-enhancement distinction, well-being
National Category
Medical Ethics Philosophy Ethics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-103680DOI: 10.1093/jmp/jht058ISI: 000329922100004OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-103680DiVA: diva2:690131
Available from: 2014-01-22 Created: 2014-01-22 Last updated: 2017-12-06Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(473 kB)281 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 473 kBChecksum SHA-512
15368fbc5f7385d01f3c9161ee4fb2e90e3758c5c661ec4b50baadca5fb66850ea749f803c004c21ce7f81f3adc807ea2d630e90e2bd7a2103332fc79f15fe6f
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Malmqvist, Erik

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Malmqvist, Erik
By organisation
Division of Health and SocietyFaculty of Arts and Sciences
In the same journal
Journal of Medicine and Philosophy
Medical EthicsPhilosophyEthics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 281 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 281 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf