liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Revisiting Popularity Characterization and Modeling for User-generated Videos
University of Saskatchewan, Canada.
University of Saskatchewan, Canada.
Linköping University, Department of Computer and Information Science, Database and information techniques. Linköping University, The Institute of Technology.
NICTA, Alexandria, NSW, Australia.
2013 (English)In: Modeling, Analysis & Simulation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems (MASCOTS), 2013 IEEE 21st International Symposium, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), 2013, 350-354 p.Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

This paper presents new results on characterization and modeling of user-generated video popularity evolution, based on a recent complementary data collection for videos that were previously the subject of an eight month data collection campaign during 2008/09. In particular, during 2011, we collected two contiguous months of weekly view counts for videos in two separate 2008/09 datasets, namely the ``recently-uploaded'' and the ``keyword-search'' datasets. These datasets contain statistics for videos that were uploaded within 7 days of the start of data collection in 2008 and videos that were discovered using a keyword search algorithm in 2008, respectively. Our analysis shows that the average weekly view count for the recently-uploaded videos had not decreased by the time of the second measurement period, in comparison to the middle and later portions of the first measurement period. The new data is used to evaluate the accuracy of a previously proposed model for synthetic view count generation for time periods that are substantially longer than previously considered. We find that the model yielded distributions of total (lifetime) video view counts that match the empirical distributions, however, significant differences between the model and empirical data were observed with respect to other metrics. These differences appear to arise because of particular popularity characteristics that change over time rather than being week-invariant as assumed in the model.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), 2013. 350-354 p.
Series
Proceedings of the International Symposium on Modeling, Analysis, and Simulation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems, ISSN 1526-7539
Keyword [en]
Video popularity dynamics; User generated content
National Category
Engineering and Technology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-105280DOI: 10.1109/MASCOTS.2013.50ISBN: 978-0-7695-5102-9 (electronic)ISBN: 978-1-4799-1209-4 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-105280DiVA: diva2:705301
Conference
IEEE 21st International Symposium on Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems (MASCOTS), 14-16 August 2013, San Francisco, CA, USA
Available from: 2014-03-15 Created: 2014-03-15 Last updated: 2017-10-30Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Carlsson, Niklas

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Carlsson, Niklas
By organisation
Database and information techniquesThe Institute of Technology
Engineering and Technology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 94 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf