liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
On Purity and Interest: On Interest Work and Epistemic Value
Linköping University, The Tema Institute, Technology and Social Change. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences. (ValueS)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7206-2046
2013 (English)Conference paper, Oral presentation with published abstract (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

The aim of this paper is to understand the ways in which the biosciences exist in a situation where values of pure and disinterested science meet imperatives to innovate on the basis of economic interests. I show how both these facets of the biosciences, purity and interest, are assembled in complex manners, with large consequences for how the biosciences are evaluated, socially, economically, and methodologically. Here, I propose analyzing the dichotomous relationship between purity/interest through two modes of purification: temporal and organizational. These two modes of purification have different consequences for how the biosciences are evaluated as Good Science, and are tied to different valorizations of the "linear model" as well as "hybrid science". Thus, I attempt to complicate Boltanski & Thévenot's analysis of justification to stress the performative aspects of coordination and conflict between different orders of worth. Concretely, the paper's focus is the studied actors’ performance of science as a moral or political project and the ways in which epistemological yardsticks – such as antibody-specificity or experimental replicability – are intertwined with and contrasted against other yardsticks – like production efficiency or medical utility. The questions that the actors grapple with are “What is Good Science?” and “What should the life sciences be concerned with?”

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2013.
National Category
Social Sciences Interdisciplinary
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-105656OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-105656DiVA: diva2:709282
Conference
4S 2013, San Diego, 9-12 October
Available from: 2014-04-01 Created: 2014-04-01 Last updated: 2014-04-01

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Authority records BETA

Lee, Francis

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lee, Francis
By organisation
Technology and Social ChangeFaculty of Arts and Sciences
Social Sciences Interdisciplinary

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 20 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf