liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
DDT - Hero or Villain?: A Case Study on Perceptions of DDT for IRS in the Limpopo Province, South Africa
Linköping University, The Tema Institute, Department of Water and Environmental Studies. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
Linköping University, The Tema Institute, Department of Water and Environmental Studies. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
2014 (English)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

The debate regarding the advantages and disadvantages of using DDT for IRS has divided the scientific community. The health benefits of reducing malaria spreading are weighed against the potential health and environmental consequences of the chemical, and opinions also differ regarding the cost-effectiveness of the use of DDT. Global recommendations regarding use of DDT for IRS have been issued by the WHO, and the receipt of these on the local level is determined by the intended beneficiaries’ perception of legitimacy of the organisation. The WHO recommendations on DDT as well as interviews conducted with residents of a South African village and representatives for two South African NGOs have been reviewed using qualitative content analysis. This method was used to highlight different perceptions of and views on DDT use, as well as for examining the potential effect that the interviewees’ perception of international institutions’ legitimacy has on their views on DDT. This study shows that the controversy regarding DDT is not as prominent on the local level as on the global level, and that the perceptions of IRS with DDT differ between the WHO, the NGOs and the residents of the village. Further, this study shows that assessing legitimacy is dependent on a definition of “the people” in question, and that the accountability of authoritative actors on different levels needs to be evaluated further.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2014. , 49 p.
Keyword [en]
DDT, malaria, WHO, IRS, NGO, South Africa, legitimacy, accountability, controversy
National Category
Environmental Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-106922ISRN: LIU-TEMA/MV-C—14/07--SEOAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-106922DiVA: diva2:719730
Subject / course
Bachelor of Science Thesis, Environmental Science Programme
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2014-05-28 Created: 2014-05-26 Last updated: 2014-05-28Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(426 kB)320 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 426 kBChecksum SHA-512
3472e6b508fc0d671fbbaf5899d0719fd8509649efe547c14ee3e23502d5b4ba8fc0255f88b0dd605d319b98b7a356483daeb75baba034b559df726e546df528
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Department of Water and Environmental StudiesFaculty of Arts and Sciences
Environmental Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 320 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 501 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf