liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Comparison of breath-alcohol screening test results with venous blood alcohol concentration in suspected drunken drivers
Vita Lab, Finland University of Helsinki, Finland .
LADR GmbH Medical Versorgungszentrum, Germany .
LADR GmbH Medical Versorgungszentrum, Germany .
National Bur Invest Forens Lab, Finland .
Show others and affiliations
2014 (English)In: Forensic Science International, ISSN 0379-0738, E-ISSN 1872-6283, Vol. 239, 57-61 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Hand-held electronic breath-alcohol analyzers are widely used by police authorities in their efforts to detect drunken drivers and to improve road-traffic safety. Over a three month period, the results of roadside breath-alcohol tests of drivers apprehended in Finland were compared with venous blood alcohol concentration (BAC). The mean (median) time between sampling blood and breath was 0.71 h (0.58 h) with a range from 0 to 6 h. Some hand-held instruments gave results as the concentration of alcohol in breath and were converted into BAC assuming a blood-breath alcohol ratio (BBR) of 2260. The mean venous BAC (1.82 g/kg) in traffic offenders was higher than the result predicted by the hand-held breath analyzers (1.72 g/kg). In 1875 roadside tests, the relationship between venous BAC (x) and BrAC (y) was defined by the regression equation y = 0.18 + 0.85x. The coefficients show both a constant bias (y-intercept 0.18 g/kg) and a proportional bias (slope = 0.85). The residual standard deviation (SD), an indicator of random variation, was +/- 0.40 g/kg. After BAC results were corrected for the time elapsed between sampling blood and breath, the y-intercept decreased to 0.10 g/kg and 0.004 g/kg, respectively, when low (0.1 g/kg/h) and high (0.25 g/kg/h) rates of alcohol elimination were used. The proportional bias of 0.85 shows that the breath-alcohol test result reads lower than the actual BAC by 15% on average. This suggests that the BBR of 2260 used for calibration should be increased by about 15% to give closer agreement between BAC and BrAC. Because of the large random variation (SD +/- 0.40 g/kg), there is considerable uncertainty if and when results from the roadside screening test are used to estimate venous BAC. The roadside breath-alcohol screening instruments worked well for the purpose of selecting drivers above the statutory limit of 0.50 g/kg.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier , 2014. Vol. 239, 57-61 p.
Keyword [en]
Alcohol; Driving; Blood; Breath; Roadside screening; Traffic safety
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-107112DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2014.03.019ISI: 000335551500012OAI: diva2:722046
Available from: 2014-06-05 Created: 2014-06-05 Last updated: 2014-06-05

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Jones, A Wayne
By organisation
Division of Drug ResearchFaculty of Health Sciences
In the same journal
Forensic Science International
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 155 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link