liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Consensus rationales in negotiating historical responsibility for climate change
Linköping University, The Tema Institute, Centre for Climate Science and Policy Research . Linköping University, The Tema Institute, Department of Water and Environmental Studies. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences. The Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute (SMHI), Norrköping, Sweden .ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1912-5538
2016 (English)In: International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, ISSN 1567-9764, E-ISSN 1573-1553, Vol. 16, no 2, 285-305 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This article explores strategies in consensus-making processes in international climate diplomacy. Specifically, it examines the consensus-making politics, in the case of negotiating historical responsibility within the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change. In doing so, analytical concepts from the discourse theory of Laclau and Mouffe are utilized to look for rationales that underpin discursive structures as well as agreement. To conclude, three rationales have dealt with conflicts over historical responsibility. While the first rationale hid conflict behind interpretative flexibility, the second reverted to “reasoned consensus,” excluding perspectives commonly understood as political rather than scientific. The third rationale has enabled equivocal use of the concept of historical responsibility in several parallel discourses, yet negotiators still stumble on how to synthesize these with a potential to foster future, more policy-detailed, consensuses with higher legitimacy. Understanding the history and current situation of negotiations on historical responsibility from this perspective can help guide policy makers toward decisions that avoid old pitfalls and construct new rationales that generate a higher sense of legitimacy.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer Netherlands, 2016. Vol. 16, no 2, 285-305 p.
Keyword [en]
Climate negotiations, Consensus, Legitimacy, Historical responsibility
National Category
Social Sciences Interdisciplinary Environmental Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-107221DOI: 10.1007/s10784-014-9258-1ISI: 000372245400006OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-107221DiVA: diva2:722927
Funder
Swedish Research Council Formas, 2011-779Swedish Energy Agency, P35462-2
Note

Funding agencies: Formas [2011-779]; Swedish Energy Agency [P35462-2]

Available from: 2014-06-09 Created: 2014-06-09 Last updated: 2017-12-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(812 kB)157 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 812 kBChecksum SHA-512
2388c7afe35a325ecdee74243c0ec79c05e067417604d3b84d1491f8d7d749069cc7e2bb410a719f02b6c11c63f5ac281453f412c38c0d99827bc556631c81da
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Friman, Mathias

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Friman, Mathias
By organisation
Centre for Climate Science and Policy Research Department of Water and Environmental StudiesFaculty of Arts and Sciences
In the same journal
International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics
Social Sciences InterdisciplinaryEnvironmental Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 157 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 247 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf