liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
ASSOCIATION BETWEEN LUMBOPELVIC PAIN, DISABILITY AND SICK LEAVE DURING PREGNANCY - A COMPARISON OF THREE SCANDINAVIAN COHORTS
Linköping University, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Division of Physiotherapy. Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences.
Stockholm County Council, Sweden Karolinska Institute, Sweden .
Oslo University, Norway.
Linköping University, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Division of Physiotherapy. Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences.
Show others and affiliations
2014 (English)In: Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, ISSN 1650-1977, E-ISSN 1651-2081, Vol. 46, no 5, 468-474 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objective: To explore the association between disability and sick leave due to lumbopelvic pain in pregnant women in 3 cohorts in Sweden and Norway and to explore possible factors of importance to sick leave. A further aim was to compare the prevalence of sick leave due to lumbopelvic pain. Design/subjects: Pregnant women (n=898) from two cohorts in Sweden and one in Norway answered to questionnaires in gestational weeks 10-24; two of the cohorts additionally in weeks 28-38. Methods: Logistic regression models were performed with sick leave due to lumbopelvic pain as dependent factor. Disability, pain, age, parity, cohort, civilian status, and occupational classification were independents factors. Results: In gestational weeks 10-24 the regression model included 895 cases; 38 on sick leave due to lumbopelvic pain. Disability, pain and cohort affiliation were associated with sick leave. In weeks 28-38, disability, pain and occupation classification were the significant factors. The prevalence of lumbopelvic pain was higher in Norway than in Sweden (65%, vs 58% and 44%; pless than0.001). Conclusion: Disability, pain intensity and occupation were associated to sick leave due to lumbopelvic pain. Yet, there were significant variations between associated factors among the cohorts, suggesting that other factors than workability and the social security system are also of importance.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Foundation for Rehabilitation Information , 2014. Vol. 46, no 5, 468-474 p.
Keyword [en]
low back pain; pelvic girdle pain; pregnancy; sick leave; disability
National Category
Physiotherapy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-107848DOI: 10.2340/16501977-1801ISI: 000336472300013OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-107848DiVA: diva2:727709
Available from: 2014-06-23 Created: 2014-06-23 Last updated: 2017-12-05

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(420 kB)184 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 420 kBChecksum SHA-512
aa02d5ddf1da595348bd99d28483540bf50189c15dc74f092fa0ce41a0646c6a7fe3b307bd8fbd5bb70a2070958606bcf57bd3a008c22cac4cdf7e177d74e65b
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Gutke, AnnelieÖberg, Birgitta

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Gutke, AnnelieÖberg, Birgitta
By organisation
Division of PhysiotherapyFaculty of Health Sciences
In the same journal
Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
Physiotherapy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 184 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 129 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf