liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Communication approaches for carbon capture and storage: Underlying assumptions of limited versus extensive public engagement
IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Linköping University, Department of Thematic Studies, Centre for Climate Science and Policy Research. Linköping University, Department of Thematic Studies, Department of Water and Environmental Studies. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
2014 (English)In: Energy Research and Social Science, ISSN 2214-6296 (Print), 2214-6326 (online), Vol. 3, 5-12 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

A pertinent issue in the literature on communication on emerging technologies such as carbon capture and storage (CCS) concerns the degree to which the public is actively involved in the communication process. While researchers have highlighted the pros and cons of limited versus extensive public engagement, the assumptions underlying various communication approaches have been largely neglected. Illuminating assumptions are important for scholarly understandings of what influences communication and for practitioner reflexive awareness in designing communication plans. This paper explores assumptions made about senders and receivers when involving the public to various degrees in CCS communication and how these assumptions relate to different communication objectives. We describe two contrasting communication approaches, the transmission and participatory approaches, relating them to CCS characteristics and research. We find that CCS communication may, deliberately or not, be based on different assumptions about the social framing of CCS concerning who should formulate the message, the public’s ability to understand complex science, the public’s interest in helping frame CCS, and whether public opinions should be taken into account. These assumptions also relate to different communication objectives – convincing the public or increasing dialogue – implying different communication fora, predictability, and input.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2014. Vol. 3, 5-12 p.
Keyword [en]
Carbon capture and storage; communication; public engagement
National Category
Social Sciences Interdisciplinary
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-107902DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2014.05.004OAI: diva2:727789
Available from: 2014-06-23 Created: 2014-06-23 Last updated: 2016-09-01Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Wibeck, Victoria
By organisation
Centre for Climate Science and Policy ResearchDepartment of Water and Environmental StudiesFaculty of Arts and Sciences
Social Sciences Interdisciplinary

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 66 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link