liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Agreement, significance, and understandings of historical responsibility in climate change negotiations
Linköping University, The Tema Institute, Centre for Climate Science and Policy Research . Linköping University, The Tema Institute, Department of Water and Environmental Studies. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1912-5538
Linköping University, The Tema Institute, Centre for Climate Science and Policy Research . Linköping University, The Tema Institute, Department of Water and Environmental Studies. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5500-3300
2015 (English)In: Climate Policy, ISSN 1469-3062, E-ISSN 1752-7457, Vol. 15, no 3, 302-320 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

For over 20 years, Parties to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change have struggled with the normative significance of history for the differentiation of responsibilities. Negotiations on ‘historical responsibility’ have been marked by considerable conflict between developed and developing countries. However, in 2010, the Parties acknowledged the concept in a consensus decision. This article analyses UN Climate Change Conference delegates' agreement with the decision, whether it reconciled conflict between interpretations of historical responsibility, and the significance that delegates ascribe to the decision for future agreements. The decision has not eliminated conflict between different interpretations. Delegates who understand historical responsibility as linking countries' historical contributions to climate change to their responsibilities to act agree more with the decision and foresee it having a stronger influence on future agreements than do those viewing the concept in more conceptual terms. The decision marks the start of negotiations concerning how rather than whether historical responsibility should guide operative text. This article demonstrates that (1) the divergent interpretations pose clear challenges for a necessary but demanding agreement on operationalization, and (2) focusing on an ambiguous version of proportionality between contribution to change and responsibility can become a first step for convergence between divergent positions.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Taylor & Francis, 2015. Vol. 15, no 3, 302-320 p.
Keyword [en]
historical responsibility; equity; negotiations; Brazilian proposal; burden sharing; cumulative emissions
National Category
Social Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-108530DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2014.916598ISI: 000352898400002OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-108530DiVA: diva2:730773
Available from: 2014-06-30 Created: 2014-06-30 Last updated: 2017-12-05

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(668 kB)450 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 668 kBChecksum SHA-512
70eb0c145372f727ab6895e2ad23bb024d83c27f28f7632bcc222dc1dd4a05d3d39504d3d2e73ae1aa408450fd08dc66d18a35a74a15c04397b7c53a38b28c0c
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Friman, MathiasHjerpe, Mattias

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Friman, MathiasHjerpe, Mattias
By organisation
Centre for Climate Science and Policy Research Department of Water and Environmental StudiesFaculty of Arts and Sciences
In the same journal
Climate Policy
Social Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 450 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 1339 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf