liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Behavioral Science Research Informs Bioethical Issues in the Conduct of Large-Scale Studies of Children's Disease Risk.
Behavioral Prevention Research, Division of Population Sciences, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, 3300 Whitehaven Street, NW, Suite 4100 Washington, DC 20007, USA..
Lund University, Sweden.
Georgetown University Medical Center, USA.
Florida State University, USA.
Show others and affiliations
2013 (English)In: AJOB Primary Research, ISSN 2150-7716, E-ISSN 2150-7724, Vol. 4, no 3, 4-14 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: Birth cohort studies of the natural history of pediatric common disease risk raise many bioethical issues, including re-consenting participants over time as children mature and cohort retention. Understanding participants' study-specific knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and behavior may offer insights into these issues from a psychological perspective.

METHODS: We conducted an analysis of factors associated with parent-child communication about minor children's participation in a population-based birth cohort; children's knowledge about their own participation; and parental willingness to be re-contacted for future study among Swedish parents (N = 3,605) of children originally enrolled at birth in a prospective study of type 1 diabetes risk.

RESULTS: More open parent-child communication about disease risk screening research and greater knowledge among children about their own research participation facilitated greater parent willingness to participate in further study. Parents' decisions about further study participation were most strongly favorable among those who communicated openly with their child and with high study-specific knowledge.

CONCLUSIONS: Epidemiologists, bioethicists, and others involved in the design and conduct of large-scale, prospective birth cohorts may consider embedding periodic assessments of participants' study-specific attitudes and behavior to address long-term retention and willingness to engage in future research.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Taylor & Francis, 2013. Vol. 4, no 3, 4-14 p.
National Category
Pediatrics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-108622DOI: 10.1080/21507716.2013.806968PubMedID: 23977442OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-108622DiVA: diva2:731336
Available from: 2014-07-01 Created: 2014-07-01 Last updated: 2017-12-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records BETA

Ludvigsson, Johnny

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ludvigsson, Johnny
By organisation
Division of Clinical SciencesFaculty of Health SciencesDepartment of Paediatrics in Linköping
In the same journal
AJOB Primary Research
Pediatrics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 144 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf