liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Folding of Aquaporin 1: multiple evidence that helix 3 can shift out of the membrane core
Stockholm University, Solna, Sweden.
Åbo Akademi, Turku, Finland.
Stockholm University, Solna, Sweden.
Linköping University, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Division of Cell Biology. Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences. University of the Basque Country, Leioa, Spain.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3894-2218
Show others and affiliations
2014 (English)In: Protein Science, ISSN 0961-8368, E-ISSN 1469-896X, Vol. 23, no 7, 981-992 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The folding of most integral membrane proteins follows a two-step process: initially, individual transmembrane helices are inserted into the membrane by the Sec translocon. Thereafter, these helices fold to shape the final conformation of the protein. However, for some proteins, including Aquaporin 1 (AQP1), the folding appears to follow a more complicated path. AQP1 has been reported to first insert as a four-helical intermediate, where helix 2 and 4 are not inserted into the membrane. In a second step, this intermediate is folded into a six-helical topology. During this process, the orientation of the third helix is inverted. Here, we propose a mechanism for how this reorientation could be initiated: first, helix 3 slides out from the membrane core resulting in that the preceding loop enters the membrane. The final conformation could then be formed as helix 2, 3, and 4 are inserted into the membrane and the reentrant regions come together. We find support for the first step in this process by showing that the loop preceding helix 3 can insert into the membrane. Further, hydrophobicity curves, experimentally measured insertion efficiencies and MD-simulations suggest that the barrier between these two hydrophobic regions is relatively low, supporting the idea that helix 3 can slide out of the membrane core, initiating the rearrangement process.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Wiley-Blackwell, 2014. Vol. 23, no 7, 981-992 p.
Keyword [en]
membrane protein; translocon recognition; protein folding; hydrophobicity; molecular dynamics
National Category
Basic Medicine Biological Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-109129DOI: 10.1002/pro.2483ISI: 000337669800014PubMedID: 24777974OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-109129DiVA: diva2:737529
Available from: 2014-08-13 Created: 2014-08-11 Last updated: 2017-12-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records BETA

Cristobal, Susana

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Cristobal, Susana
By organisation
Division of Cell BiologyFaculty of Health Sciences
In the same journal
Protein Science
Basic MedicineBiological Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 55 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf