liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Pupils Doing Language Policy: Micro-interactional insights from the English as a foreign language classroom
Linköping University, Department of Culture and Communication, Language and Culture. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
Linköping University, Department of Culture and Communication, Modern Languages. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
2014 (English)In: Apples - Journal of Applied Language Studies, ISSN 1457-9863, Vol. 8, no 2, 93-113 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

In this paper, we examine instances of the methods pupils deploy to do language policy in an English as a foreign language classroom in Sweden, where there is a locally practised English-only rule. Although we exemplify some more tacit methods of constructing a monolingual classroom (Slotte-Lüttge 2007), we focus primarily on instances where pupils police other pupils and on occasion even the teacher, when they are perceived not to be upholding the rule. This blatantly explicit method of pupils doing language policy, which we term language policing, generally serves to (re-)establish and maintain English as the medium of interaction and instruction. The data for this study consists of video-recordings of 18 EFL lessons in an International Swedish school and was collected in grade 8 and 9 classes (15-16 year olds) between the years 2007-2010. In order to reveal the interactional orientations of the participants in situ (Seedhouse, 1998:101), conversation analysis has been used to identify and analyse naturally occurring cases of pupils doing language policy. By discussing the analyses with reference to different policing trajectories, how participants employ a range of initiator techniques, and the nature and distribution of their policing methods, for example, we elucidate the empirical basis for our subcategories of pupil- initiated policing. We also relate language policing practices to the maintenance of a monolingual classroom and conclude that establishing and maintaining the English-only rule “sufficient[ly] for all practical purposes” is a routine matter (cf. Zimmerman 1971:227), since little language policing is needed to maintain it. In cases where the language rule is breached, both pupils and teacher play an active role in (re-)establishing themonolingual classroom.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Centre for Applied Language Studies, University of Jyväskylä , 2014. Vol. 8, no 2, 93-113 p.
Keyword [en]
Conversation Analysis, practiced language policy, language policing, English as a Foreign Language (EFL), codeswitching.
National Category
Educational Sciences
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-109347OAI: diva2:737854
Available from: 2014-08-14 Created: 2014-08-14 Last updated: 2014-09-18Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Link to article

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Amir, AliaMusk, Nigel
By organisation
Language and CultureFaculty of Arts and SciencesModern Languages
Educational Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 102 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link